Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963774›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2019

Why are UK junior doctors taking time out of training and what are their experiences? A qualitative study.

Chantelle Rizan, Julia Montgomery, Charlotte Ramage, Jan Welch, Graeme Dewhurst

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. NICE values, essential values.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chantelle Rizan1 Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9518-2948
Julia Montgomery2 Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton BN1 9PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4133-8820
Charlotte Ramage3 School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton BN1 9QW, UK.
Jan Welch4 South Thames Foundation School, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Graeme Dewhurst5 Health Education England Kent Surrey and Sussex, London WC1B 5DN, UK.
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GBHealth Education England · GBSouth Thames College · GBUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Brighton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe number of doctors directly entering UK specialty training after their foundation year 2 (F2) has steadily declined from 83% in 2010 to 42.6% in 2017. The year following F2, outside the UK training pathway, is informally termed an 'F3' year. There is a paucity of qualitative research exploring why increasingly doctors are taking F3s. The aim of this study is to explore the reasons why F2 doctors are choosing to take a year out of training and the impact upon future career choices.

designThis is an exploratory qualitative study, using in-depth interviews and content analysis.

settingUK.

participantsFourteen participants were interviewed from one foundation school. Participants included five doctors who commenced their F3 in 2015, five who started in 2016 and finally four recently starting this in 2017.

main outcome measuresContent analysis was conducted to distill the themes which exemplified the totality of the experience of the three groups.

resultsThere were four predominant themes arising within the data set which can be framed as 'unmet needs' arising within foundation years, sought to be fulfilled by the F3 year. First, doctors describe exhaustion and stress resulting in a need for a 'break'. Second, doctors required more time to make decisions surrounding specialty applications and prepare competitive portfolios. Third, participants felt a loss of control which was (partially) regained during their F3s. The final theme was the impact of taking time out upon return to training (for those participants who had completed their F3 year). When doctors returned to NHS posts they brought valuable experience.

conclusionsThis study provides evidence to support the important ongoing initiatives from Health Education England and other postgraduate bodies, exploring approaches to further engage, retain and support the junior doctor workforce.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMedical Staff, HospitalMedicineAdultCareer ChoiceDecision MakingEducationFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdomcontinuous professional developmentdoctor’s morale and wellbeingPostgraduatequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID30963774
PMCPMC6512174
OpenAlexW2937808056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.