ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2019
Why are UK junior doctors taking time out of training and what are their experiences? A qualitative study.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Returning to clinical work and doctors' personal, social and organisational needs: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- When democracies coerce their health professionals: institutional constraints and policy outcomes across four jurisdictions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Implementing and sustaining dementia care coordinators across integrated care systems: a realist evaluation.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Five-Year results of a multi-specialty induction course for surgical training.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- How do foundation year and internship experience shape doctors' career intentions and decisions? A meta-ethnography.Medical teacher · 2023Article
- Recommendations for improving the working conditions and cultures of distressed junior doctors, based on a qualitative study and stakeholder perspectives.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Factors affecting the UK junior doctor workforce retention crisis: an integrative review.BMJ open · 2022Review
- Understanding the impact of professional motivation on the workforce crisis in medicine: a rapid review.BJGP open · 2021Article
- Reinventing Undergraduate Clinical Placements with a Switch to Delivery by Clinical Teaching Fellows.Advances in medical education and practice · 2021Article
- Barriers to getting into postgraduate specialty training for junior Australian doctors: An interview-based study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Comments on: Emotional Intelligence Level Higher in Residents Who Took a Gap Year Before Medical School [Letter].Advances in medical education and practice · 2020Article
- Article
- NICE values, essential values.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe number of doctors directly entering UK specialty training after their foundation year 2 (F2) has steadily declined from 83% in 2010 to 42.6% in 2017. The year following F2, outside the UK training pathway, is informally termed an 'F3' year. There is a paucity of qualitative research exploring why increasingly doctors are taking F3s. The aim of this study is to explore the reasons why F2 doctors are choosing to take a year out of training and the impact upon future career choices.
designThis is an exploratory qualitative study, using in-depth interviews and content analysis.
settingUK.
participantsFourteen participants were interviewed from one foundation school. Participants included five doctors who commenced their F3 in 2015, five who started in 2016 and finally four recently starting this in 2017.
main outcome measuresContent analysis was conducted to distill the themes which exemplified the totality of the experience of the three groups.
resultsThere were four predominant themes arising within the data set which can be framed as 'unmet needs' arising within foundation years, sought to be fulfilled by the F3 year. First, doctors describe exhaustion and stress resulting in a need for a 'break'. Second, doctors required more time to make decisions surrounding specialty applications and prepare competitive portfolios. Third, participants felt a loss of control which was (partially) regained during their F3s. The final theme was the impact of taking time out upon return to training (for those participants who had completed their F3 year). When doctors returned to NHS posts they brought valuable experience.
conclusionsThis study provides evidence to support the important ongoing initiatives from Health Education England and other postgraduate bodies, exploring approaches to further engage, retain and support the junior doctor workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.