Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963448›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019

A community pharmacist medicines optimisation service for patients with advanced cancer pain: a proof of concept study.

Zoe Edwards, Michael I Bennett, Alison Blenkinsopp

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role of community pharmacists in cancer survivorship care - a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zoe EdwardsSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Richmond Building, Richmond Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK. Z.Edwards@Bradford.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6525-8190
Michael I BennettUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Alison BlenkinsoppSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Richmond Building, Richmond Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK.
University of Bradford · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-DG-1108-10010Department of Health RP-PG-0610-10114National Institute for Health Research RP-PG-0610-10114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Patients with advanced cancer commonly experience pain and it is least controlled in community settings. Community pharmacists in the UK already offer medicines optimisation consultations although not for this patient group. Objective To determine whether medicines consultations for patients with advanced cancer pain are feasible and acceptable. Setting Community-dwelling patients with advanced cancer pain were recruited from primary, secondary and tertiary care using purposive sampling in one UK city. Methods One face-to-face or two telephone delivered medicines optimisation consultations by pharmacists were tested. These were based on services currently delivered in UK community pharmacies. Feedback was obtained from patients and healthcare professionals involved to assess feasibility and acceptability. Main outcome measure Recruitment, acceptability and drug related problems. Results Twenty-three patients, (range 33-88 years) were recruited, 19 completed consultation(s) of whom 17 were receiving palliative care services. Five received face-to-face consultations and 14 by telephone during which 47 drug related problems were identified from 33 consultations (mean 2.5). Advice was provided for 34 drug related problems in 17 patients and referral to other healthcare professionals for 13 in 8 patients, 2 patients had none. Eleven patients returned questionnaires of which 8 (73%) would recommend the consultations to others. Conclusion The consultations were feasible as patients were recruited, retained, consultations delivered, and data collected. Patients found the 20-30 min intervention acceptable, found a self-perceived increase in medicines knowledge and most would recommend it to others. Community pharmacists were willing to carry out these services however they had confidence issues in accessing working knowledge. Most drug related problems were resolved by the pharmacists and even among patients receiving palliative care services there were still issues concerning analgesic management. Pharmacist-conducted medicines consultations demonstrate potential which now needs to be evaluated within a larger study in the future.

Indexed as

Professional RoleProof of Concept StudyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCancer PainCommunity Pharmacy ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacistsCancerCommunity pharmacyMedicines optimisationPainPalliative careRemote consultationUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30963448
PMCPMC6554241
OpenAlexW2936676461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.