Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963438›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

A National Survey of Internal Medicine Primary Care Residency Program Directors.

Paul O'Rourke, Eva Tseng, Karen Chacko, Marc Shalaby, Anne Cioletti, Scott Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul O'RourkeDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. porourk3@jhu.edu.
Eva TsengDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Karen ChackoDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Marc ShalabyDivision of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Anne CiolettiDivision of Primary Care and Value-Based Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Scott WrightDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe United States is facing a primary care physician shortage. Internal medicine (IM) primary care residency programs have expanded substantially in the past several decades, but there is a paucity of literature on their characteristics and graduate outcomes.

objectiveWe aimed to characterize the current US IM primary care residency landscape, assess graduate outcomes, and identify unique programmatic or curricular factors that may be associated with a high proportion of graduates pursuing primary care careers.

designCross-sectional study

participantsSeventy out of 100 (70%) IM primary care program directors completed the survey. MAIN MEASURES: Descriptive analyses of program characteristics, educational curricula, clinical training experiences, and graduate outcomes were performed. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between ≥ 50% of graduates in 2016 and 2017 entering a primary care career and program characteristics, educational curricula, and clinical training experiences. KEY

resultsOver half of IM primary care program graduates in 2016 and 2017 pursued a primary care career upon residency graduation. The majority of program, curricular, and clinical training factors assessed were not associated with programs that have a majority of their graduates pursuing a primary care career path. However, programs with a majority of program graduates entering a primary care career were less likely to have X + Y scheduling compared to the other programs.

conclusionsIM primary care residency programs are generally succeeding in their mission in that the majority of graduates are heading into primary care careers.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyMalePhysician ExecutivesPrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationUnited Statesmedical education-career choicemedical education-graduatemedical student and residency educationprimary caresurvey research

Identifiers

PMID30963438
PMCPMC6614222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.