ArticleHuman cell2019
Proliferation of poorly differentiated endometrial cancer cells through autocrine activation of FGF receptor and HES1 expression.
Article in Human cell, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hes1 in malignant tumors: from molecular mechanism to therapeutic potential.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with poorly differentiated endometrial cancer show poor prognosis, and effective molecular target-based therapies are needed. Endometrial cancer cells proliferate depending on the activation of HES1 (hairy and enhancer of split-1), which is induced by several pathways, such as the Notch and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling pathways. In addition, aberrant, ligand-free activation of the FGFR signaling pathway resulting from mutations in FGFR2 was also reported in endometrial cancer. However, a clinical trial showed that there was no difference in the effectiveness of FGFR inhibitors between patients with and without the FGFR2 mutation, suggesting a presence of another signaling pathway for the FGFR activation. Here, we investigated the signaling pathway regulating the expression of HES1 and proliferation of poorly and well-differentiated endometrial cancer cell lines Ishikawa and HEC-50B, respectively. Whereas Ishikawa cells proliferated and expressed HES1 in a Notch signaling-dependent manner, Notch signaling was not involved in HES1 and proliferation of HEC-50B cells. The FGFR inhibitor, NVP-BGJ398, decreased HES1 expression and proliferation of HEC-50B cells; however, HEC50B cells had no mutations in the FGFR2 gene. Instead, HEC-50B cells highly expressed ligands for FGFR2, suggesting that FGFR2 is activated by an autocrine manner, not by ligand-free activation. This autocrine pathway activated Akt downstream of FGFR for cell proliferation. Our findings suggest the usefulness of HES1 as a marker for the proliferation signaling and that FGFR inhibitor may be effective for poorly differentiated endometrial cancers that harbor wild-type FGFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.