Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963385›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2019

Calibrating a Predictive Model of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis with Quantitative MRI.

David A Hormuth, Angela M Jarrett, Xinzeng Feng, Thomas E Yankeelov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identifiability and model selection frameworks for models of high-grade glioma response to chemoradiation.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David A HormuthOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 E. 24th Street, POB 4.102, 1 University Station (C0200), Austin, TX, 78712-1229, USA. david.hormuth@austin.utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9643-1694
Angela M JarrettOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 E. 24th Street, POB 4.102, 1 University Station (C0200), Austin, TX, 78712-1229, USA.
Xinzeng FengOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 E. 24th Street, POB 4.102, 1 University Station (C0200), Austin, TX, 78712-1229, USA.
Thomas E YankeelovOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 E. 24th Street, POB 4.102, 1 University Station (C0200), Austin, TX, 78712-1229, USA.

Funding

Quantitative MRI for Predicting Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant TherapyU01CA142565 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KARCZMAR, GREGORY S., NANDA, RITA · 2010 to 2019
$4.5M
Shutter-Speed Model DCE-MRI for Assessment of Response to Cancer TherapyU01CA154602 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, WEI, RYAN, CHRISTOPHER WALTER · 2011 to 2015
$2.9M
Image Driven Multi-Scale Modeling to Predict Treatment Response in Breast CancerU01CA174706 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARANTA, VITO, YANKEELOV, THOMAS E · 2013 to 2018
$2.5M
Evaluation and Validation of Imaging Biomarkers of Tumor Response to TreatmentR01CA138599 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MCINTYRE, JAMES OLIVER · 2010 to 2015
$2.2M
American Association of Physicists in Medicine Research Seed GrantCancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas RR160005NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138599NCI NIH HHS U01 CA142565NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154602NCI NIH HHS U01 CA174706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spatiotemporal variations in tumor vasculature inevitably alters cell proliferation and treatment efficacy. Thus, rigorous characterization of tumor dynamics must include a description of this phenomenon. We have developed a family of biophysical models of tumor growth and angiogenesis that are calibrated with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) MRI data to provide individualized tumor growth forecasts. Tumor and blood volume fractions were evolved using two, coupled partial differential equations consisting of proliferation, diffusion, and death terms. To evaluate these models, rats (n = 8) with C6 gliomas were imaged seven times. The tumor volume fraction was estimated using DW-MRI, while DCE-MRI provided estimates of the blood volume fraction. The first three time points were used to calibrate model parameters, which were then used to predict growth at the remaining four time points and compared directly to the measurements. The best performing model predicted tumor growth with less than 10.3% error in tumor volume and with less than 9.4% error at the voxel-level at all prediction time points. The best performing model resulted in less than 9.3% error in blood volume at the voxel-level. This pre-clinical study demonstrates the potential for image-based, mechanistic modeling of tumor growth and angiogenesis.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCalibrationCell Line, TumorFemaleGliomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeovascularization, PathologicRats, WistarTumor BurdenDCE-MRIDiffusionDW-MRIGliomaModeling

Identifiers

PMID30963385
PMCPMC6544501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.