Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963275›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2019

Image-based biomarkers for solid tumor quantification.

Peter Savadjiev, Jaron Chong, Anthony Dohan, Vincent Agnus, Reza Forghani, Caroline Reinhold, Benoit Gallix

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04802954 (Risk Stratification of Hepatocarcinogenesis Using a Deep Learning Based Clinical, Biological and Ultrasound Model in High-risk Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04802954 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Risk Stratification of Hepatocarcinogenesis Using a Deep Learning Based Clinical, Biological and Ultrasound Model in High-risk Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorIHU StrasbourgRan2021 to 2024Enrolled400ConditionsHepatocellular Carcinoma, Chronic Liver DiseaseArmsVideo acquisition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter SavadjievDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jaron ChongDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1001 Décarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Anthony DohanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1001 Décarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Vincent AgnusInstitut de chirurgie guidée par l'image IHU Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Reza ForghaniDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1001 Décarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Caroline ReinholdDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1001 Décarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Benoit GallixDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1001 Décarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. benoit.gallix@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0050-8608

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last few decades have witnessed tremendous technological developments in image-based biomarkers for tumor quantification and characterization. Initially limited to manual one- and two-dimensional size measurements, image biomarkers have evolved to harness developments not only in image acquisition technology but also in image processing and analysis algorithms. At the same time, clinical validation remains a major challenge for the vast majority of these novel techniques, and there is still a major gap between the latest technological developments and image biomarkers used in everyday clinical practice. Currently, the imaging biomarker field is attracting increasing attention not only because of the tremendous interest in cutting-edge therapeutic developments and personalized medicine but also because of the recent progress in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to large-scale datasets. Thus, the goal of the present article is to review the current state of the art for image biomarkers and their use for characterization and predictive quantification of solid tumors. Beginning with an overview of validated imaging biomarkers in current clinical practice, we proceed to a review of AI-based methods for tumor characterization, such as radiomics-based approaches and deep learning.Key Points• Recent years have seen tremendous technological developments in image-based biomarkers for tumor quantification and characterization.• Image-based biomarkers can be used on an ongoing basis, in a non-invasive (or mildly invasive) way, to monitor the development and progression of the disease or its response to therapy.• We review the current state of the art for image biomarkers, as well as the recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for image processing and analysis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkers, TumorDeep LearningHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorArtificial intelligence (AI)BiomarkersComputer-assisted image interpretationComputer-assisted image processingDiagnostic imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.