Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963271›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2019

Radiofrequency ablation of liver metastasis: potential impact on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Yasunori Minami, Naoshi Nishida, Masatoshi Kudo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Role of T cells in liver metastasis.Cell death & disease · 2024
    Review
  7. Lipoxygenases at the Intersection of Infection and Carcinogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasunori MinamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan. minkun@med.kindai.ac.jp.
Naoshi NishidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Masatoshi KudoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Kindai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a generally accepted alternative therapy for patients with liver metastases, is a minimally invasive approach with a favorable safety profile and a lower rate of major complications. The use of RFA or combined RFA plus resection can produce total tumor clearance in patients with unresectable liver metastases. However, the relatively high rate of local tumor progression has prevented the widespread use of RFA. Furthermore, its efficacy is controversial because there have been no comparisons for its effect on overall survival compared with standard options such as systemic chemotherapy. Meanwhile, immunotherapy has become a major research focus for oncology based on the recent successes reported for immune checkpoint inhibitors for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, gastric cancer, and other cancers. Immune checkpoints negatively regulate T cell function, and inhibition prevents the blockade of the immune system by cancer cells to prevent their destruction. Unfortunately, only some patients (< 25%) respond to immuno-oncology drugs, whereas other patients acquire resistance. However, RFA can induce massive necrotic cell death which might activate immunity and the presentation of cryptic antigens to induce tumor-specific T cell response. Because RFA can induce the rapid release of large amounts of tumor antigens, it can potentially stimulate transient immune responses to much tumor antigens. Combination therapies have induced synergistic enhancement of anticancer immune response in preclinical studies, indicating great promise for the future of oncologic treatment.Key Points • Only some patients respond to immuno-oncology drugs. • RFA causes the release of large amounts of cellular debris, a source of tumor antigens that elicit immune responses against tumors. • Combination RFA for liver metastases and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies might synergistically enhance antitumor immunity.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapyLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasm MetastasisRadiofrequency AblationTomography, X-Ray ComputedImmunologic FactorsAblation techniquesImmunotherapyLiverNeoplasm metastases

Identifiers

PMID30963271
OpenAlexW2933314153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.