ArticleJournal of neurology2019
Risk of traffic accidents after onset of vestibular disease assessed with a surrogate marker.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Driving ability in patients with dizziness: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Pooled it
- A Nationwide Population-Based Study on the Association between Land Transport Accident and Peripheral Vestibular Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo determine if the risk of traffic accidents increases after disease onset in patients with acute vestibular disorders. That could provide a valid rationale for guidelines on driving restrictions.
methods5,260,054 patient data (> 18 years of age) from a statutory health insurer were used to identify traffic injuries in incident cases of Menière's disease (MD) and vestibular neuritis (VN) in 2010-2013. Incident diagnoses were defined as the absence of such diagnoses in the preceding 5 years. Comparators were insured individuals with no such diagnoses throughout 2005-2017. The surrogate for traffic injuries were whiplash injuries coded in ICD-10 as diagnosis of sprain of ligaments of the cervical spine without structural changes.
resultsWe identified 4509 incident patients with Menière's disease and 25,448 with vestibular neuritis and 5,102,655 controls with no such diagnoses throughout the observation period. The incidence of traffic injuries was increased for both vestibular disorders prior to the time point of diagnosis-MD 0.72 [0.47; 0.97] and VN 0.66 [0.56; 0.76] compared to controls (0.46 [0.46; 0.47]). The temporal course of incidence in whiplash injuries showed no increase and was 0.64 [0.41; 0.88] for MD at diagnosis and 0.73 [0.48; 0.98] after diagnosis, for VN it was 0.81 [0.70; 0.92] at diagnosis and 0.65 [0.55; 0.74] after diagnosis.
conclusionsAlthough these data were not originally collected to address the research question, they provide a valid body of evidence. There is no rationale for driving restrictions, which substantially interfere with the individuals' quality of life, in patients with incident MD and VN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30963255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.