ReviewHNO2019
[Differentiating cochlear synaptopathies into different hearing disorders].
Review in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Embryology, Malformations, and Rare Diseases of the Cochlea.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to demographic change and altered recreational behavior, a rapid increase in hearing deficits is expected in the next 20-30 years. Consequently, the risk of age-related loss of speech discrimination, tinnitus, hyperacusis, or-as recently shown-dementia, will also increase. There are increasing indications that the loss of specific hearing fibers in humans and animals is involved in various hearing disorders. This fiber loss can be caused by cochlear synaptopathy or deafferentation and does not necessarily lead to clinically measurable threshold changes. Animal experiments have shown that reduced auditory nerve activity due to acoustic trauma or aging can be centrally compensated by disproportionately elevated and faster auditory brainstem responses (ABR). The analysis of the suprathreshold amplitudes of auditory evoked brain stem potentials and their latency in combination with non-invasive imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging can help to identify the central compensatory ability of subjects and to assign defined hearing deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30963221What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.