Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963181›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2019

[Mechanical ventilation in neurological organizational units in Germany].

Martin Groß, Marcus Pohl, Oliver Summ, Peter Young, Martin Winterholler, Anette Weigel, Rainer Röhrig

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Quality of Care for People with Home Mechanical Ventilation in Germany: A Scoping Review].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Martin GroßKlinik für Neurologische Intensivmedizin und Frührehabilitation, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Steinweg 13-17, 26122, Oldenburg, Deutschland. martin.gross@evangelischeskrankenhaus.de.
Marcus PohlHelios Klinik Schloss Pulsnitz, Pulsnitz, Deutschland.
Oliver SummKlinik für Neurologische Intensivmedizin und Frührehabilitation, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Steinweg 13-17, 26122, Oldenburg, Deutschland.
Peter YoungUniversitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
Martin WinterhollerKrankenhaus Rummelsberg, Rummelsberg, Deutschland.
Anette WeigelKlinik für Neurologische Intensivmedizin und Frührehabilitation, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Steinweg 13-17, 26122, Oldenburg, Deutschland.
Rainer RöhrigCarl-von-Ossietzky-Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Deutschland.
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEHelios Kliniken · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical ventilation is provided for neurological patients in the following settings: in neurointensive care units, in centers providing weaning and early rehabilitation and in home mechanical ventilation. In the last decade there has been a sharp rise in treatment and bed capacities for mechanically ventilated neurological patients in specialized centers in Germany in the areas of weaning and neurological neurosurgical early rehabilitation of ventilated patients. Neither the number of beds nor details about structures in these centers with respect to bed capacity, personnel and qualifications, equipment, treatment methods and concepts are known.

objectiveThe aim of this survey was to generate detailed numbers regarding structural criteria of specialized centers for mechanically ventilated neurology patients, regarding hospital beds, technical infrastructure, personnel and qualifications as well as treatment methods and concepts. MATERIAL AND

methodsAn online survey with 48 questions on the type and size of the institution, structural criteria, equipment and personnel was developed and supported by the German Society for Neurology (DGN), the German Interdisciplinary Society of Out-of-Hospital Ventilation (DIGAB) and the German Society of Neurorehabilitation (DGNR).

resultsA total of 63 centers took part in the survey and reported a total of 687 beds for mechanically ventilated neurological patients. Furthermore, they reported complex structures regarding personnel and qualifications, medical devices, methods and concepts but neurophysiological electrophysiology was the only technical method provided in all centers. Of the institutions 49% (n = 27/55) provided the initiation of home mechanical ventilation, 18% (n = 18/55) provided inpatient control of home mechanical ventilation, 9% (n = 5/55) had an outpatient department for home mechanical ventilation and 18% (n = 10/55) extracted data from home ventilators.

conclusionMechanical ventilation in neurological units offers vast and complex treatment and bed capacities for severely ill patients in Germany. The structures are inhomogeneous and a consensus on specific criteria should be established. This is especially true for the treatment of patients needing out-of-hospital mechanical ventilation, also with respect to a possible weaning in the long-term duration of the disease.

Indexed as

NeurologyRespiration, ArtificialGermanyHome Care ServicesHumansNeurological RehabilitationSurveys and QuestionnairesVentilator WeaningEarly rehabilitationHealthcare provisionHome ventilationNeurointensive care medicineWeaning

Identifiers

PMID30963181
OpenAlexW2937939168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.