ArticleHeliyon2019
Further evidence that item responses on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale exhibit the characteristic pattern in the general population.
Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spirituality and religiosity in cancer care: A targeted review of the NCCN distress thermometer and implications for holistic screening.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Review
- What Are You Waiting For?! Roles of Motivation, Goal Orientation, and Emotion Regulation in Explaining the Link Between ADHD and Procrastination.Journal of attention disorders · 2026Article
- Article
- Debt, sleep deprivation and psychological distress among online ride-hailing drivers: evidence from China.General psychiatry · 2024Article
- Article
- The GAD-7 and the PHQ-8 exhibit the same mathematical pattern of item responses in the general population: analysis of data from the National Health Interview Survey.BMC psychology · 2021Article
- Review
- Severe psychological distress among patients with epilepsy during the COVID-19 outbreak in southwest China.Epilepsia · 2020Article
- Age-Related Changes in Item Responses to the Patient Health Questionnaire-9: Evidence From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies suggested that item responses on the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) exhibit characteristic distributions among the general population. To confirm the reproducibility of these findings, we conducted a pattern analysis of the K6 item responses using large-scale data from a US representative survey.
methodsData were drawn from the 2016, and 2017 National Health Interview Survey in the United States (33,028, and 26,742 individuals, respectively). We analyzed the patterns of item responses for the six items using normal and logarithmic scales and proposed a model of item responses.
resultsThe lines for item responses showed the same pattern among the six items, characterized by crossing at a single point between "none" and "a little," and parallel patterns from "a little" to "all of the time" on a logarithmic scale. The ratio of "some" to "a little," "most" to "some," and "most" to "all of the time" were similar across the six items. The model of item responses, which was based on the findings that the decreasing ratios of "some" to "a little," "most" to "some," and "all of the time" to "most" were similar across the six items, explained the characteristic patterns of item responses.
conclusionThese results provide further evidence that item responses on the K6 follow a particular distribution pattern among the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.