Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963123›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2019

Further evidence that item responses on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale exhibit the characteristic pattern in the general population.

Shinichiro Tomitaka, Yohei Kawasaki, Kazuki Ide, Maiko Akutagawa, Yutaka Ono, Toshiaki A Furukawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Spirituality and religiosity in cancer care: A targeted review of the NCCN distress thermometer and implications for holistic screening.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shinichiro TomitakaDepartment of Mental Health, Panasonic Health Center Tokyo, Japan.
Yohei KawasakiClinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Kazuki IdeDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Maiko AkutagawaDepartment of Drug Evaluation and Informatics School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yutaka OnoCenter for the Development of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Training, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiaki A FurukawaDepartment of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies suggested that item responses on the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) exhibit characteristic distributions among the general population. To confirm the reproducibility of these findings, we conducted a pattern analysis of the K6 item responses using large-scale data from a US representative survey.

methodsData were drawn from the 2016, and 2017 National Health Interview Survey in the United States (33,028, and 26,742 individuals, respectively). We analyzed the patterns of item responses for the six items using normal and logarithmic scales and proposed a model of item responses.

resultsThe lines for item responses showed the same pattern among the six items, characterized by crossing at a single point between "none" and "a little," and parallel patterns from "a little" to "all of the time" on a logarithmic scale. The ratio of "some" to "a little," "most" to "some," and "most" to "all of the time" were similar across the six items. The model of item responses, which was based on the findings that the decreasing ratios of "some" to "a little," "most" to "some," and "all of the time" to "most" were similar across the six items, explained the characteristic patterns of item responses.

conclusionThese results provide further evidence that item responses on the K6 follow a particular distribution pattern among the general population.

Indexed as

Clinical psychologyEpidemiologyPsychiatryPublic health

Identifiers

PMID30963123
PMCPMC6434102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.