Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963036›Full record

ArticlePublic health action2019

Tuberculosis-diabetes screening: how well are we doing? A mixed-methods study from North India.

A Majumdar, E Wilkinson, P K Rinu, T M Maung, D Bachani, J S Punia, S Jain, T Yadav, P Jarhyan, S Mohan and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health action, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Tuberculosis deaths are predictable and preventable: Comprehensive assessment and clinical care is the key.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Is Completeness and Timeliness of Public Health Action (PHA) a Robust Tool to Improve the TB Treatment Outcome in the Private Sector?Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

A MajumdarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
E WilkinsonInstitute of Medicine, University of Chester, Chester, UK.
P K RinuPublic Health Foundation of India.
T M MaungDepartment of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Sports, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
D BachaniJohn Snow India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, India.
J S PuniaHaryana Health Department, Sonipat, India.
S JainHaryana Health Department, Sonipat, India.
T YadavHaryana District Tuberculosis Office, Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme, Sonipat, India.
P JarhyanPublic Health Foundation of India.
S MohanPublic Health Foundation of India.
A M V KumarInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France.
Public Health Foundation of India · INGovernment of Haryana · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal · INMinistry of Health and Sports · MMUniversity of Chester · GBYenepoya University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingPublic health care facilities in Sonipat District, Haryana State, India.

objectivesTo assess 1) the proportion of tuberculosis (TB) patients screened for diabetes mellitus (DM) and vice versa, 2) factors associated with screening, and 3) the enablers, barriers and solutions related to screening.

designA mixed-methods study with quantitative (cohort study involving record reviews of patients registered between November 2016 and April 2017) and qualitative (interviews of patients, health care providers [HCPs] and key district-level staff) components.

resultsScreening for TB among DM patients was not implemented, despite documents indicating that it had been. Of 562 TB patients, only 137 (24%) were screened for DM. TB patients registered at tertiary and secondary health centres were more likely to be screened than primary health centres. Low patient awareness, poor knowledge of guidelines among HCPs, lack of staff and inadequate training were barriers to screening. Enablers were the positive attitude of HCPs and programme staff. The key solutions suggested were to improve awareness of HCPs and patients regarding the need for screening, training of HCPs and wider availability of DM testing facilities.

conclusionThe implementation of bidirectional screening was poor. Adequate staffing, regular training, continuous laboratory supplies for DM diagnosis and widespread publicity should be ensured.

Indexed as

health systemsoperational researchpolicy implementationprogrammeSORT IT

Identifiers

PMID30963036
PMCPMC6436489
OpenAlexW2927028447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.