Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30962889›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Differentiations of determinants for the community compositions of bacteria, fungi, and nitrogen fixers in various steppes.

Rong Sheng, Ke Li, Wenzhao Zhang, Hai Wang, Honglin Liu, Xiaoya Zhu, Hongxin Wu, Xiaoqing Zhang, Qimei Lin, Xuecheng Sun and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rong ShengKey Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Regions and Taoyuan Agro-ecosystem Research Station, Soil Molecular Ecology Section, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5441-8520
Ke LiKey Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Regions and Taoyuan Agro-ecosystem Research Station, Soil Molecular Ecology Section, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha China.
Wenzhao ZhangKey Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Regions and Taoyuan Agro-ecosystem Research Station, Soil Molecular Ecology Section, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha China.
Hai WangInstitute of Grassland Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Huhehaote China.
Honglin LiuInstitute of Grassland Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Huhehaote China.
Xiaoya ZhuCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences China Agricultural University Beijing China.
Hongxin WuInstitute of Grassland Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Huhehaote China.
Xiaoqing ZhangInstitute of Grassland Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Huhehaote China.
Qimei LinCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences China Agricultural University Beijing China.
Xuecheng SunCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences Huazhong Agricultural University Wuhan China.
Yafang TangHubei Key Laboratory of Quality Control of Characteristic Fruits and Vegetables, College of Life Science and Technology Hubei Engineering University Xiaogan China.
Lamus AInstitute of Grassland Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Huhehaote China.
Wenxue WeiKey Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Regions and Taoyuan Agro-ecosystem Research Station, Soil Molecular Ecology Section, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different types of steppes could provide heterogeneous habitat environments for underground microorganisms, but much less is known about how soil microbes fit the distinct habitats and what are the underlying mechanisms in shaping their community patterns.We simultaneously examined the community compositions and structures of soil bacteria, fungi, and diazotrophs across desert, typical, and meadow steppes in Inner Mongolia using high-throughput sequencing.The results showed that soil bacteria, fungi, and diazotrophs exhibited different distribution patterns across steppe types. Although different steppes displayed obvious differences in climate conditions, plant traits, and soil properties, most of bacterial species were shared by all the steppes while only a few species were unique, indicating that the soil bacterial compositions were hardly influenced by the steppe types. Nevertheless, the habitat heterogeneity could cause shifts in the relative abundance of some bacterial groups, which resulted in significant changes in the community structure of soil bacteria across steppes. However, the fungal community compositions and structures were similar in typical and meadow steppes but that in desert steppe were significantly different. Whereas, the community compositions and structures of diazotrophs were strongly related to the steppe types. In this study, the similar parent material backgrounds of the steppe soils might be the important factor in shaping the homologous bacterial compositions. However, the variations in soil fertility, soil water repellency, and plant species across steppes would be the major driving forces in regulating the compositions and structures of fungal communities, while the diazotrophic communities would be more closely related to the changes in plant traits and soil fertility among steppes.Our results provided evidence of habitat specificity for different microbial groups and their underlying drivers.

Indexed as

bacteriacommunity compositiondiazotrophfungisteppe grassland

Identifiers

PMID30962889
PMCPMC6434564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.