Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30962879›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

A comparison of techniques for classifying behavior from accelerometers for two species of seabird.

Allison Patterson, Hugh Grant Gilchrist, Lorraine Chivers, Scott Hatch, Kyle Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison PattersonDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences McGill University Ste Anne-de-Bellevue Quebec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9931-2693
Hugh Grant GilchristEnvironment and Climate Change Canada National Wildlife Research Centre Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Lorraine ChiversInstitute for Seabird Research and Conservation Anchorage Alaska.
Scott HatchInstitute for Seabird Research and Conservation Anchorage Alaska.
Kyle ElliottDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences McGill University Ste Anne-de-Bellevue Quebec Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The behavior of many wild animals remains a mystery, as it is difficult to quantify behavior of species that cannot be easily followed throughout their daily or seasonal movements. Accelerometers can solve some of these mysteries, as they collect activity data at a high temporal resolution (<1 s), can be relatively small (<1 g) so they minimally disrupt behavior, and are increasingly capable of recording data for long periods. Nonetheless, there is a need for increased validation of methods to classify animal behavior from accelerometers to promote widespread adoption of this technology in ecology. We assessed the accuracy of six different behavioral assignment methods for two species of seabird, thick-billed murres (

Indexed as

accelerometeranimal behaviorbehavioral classificationmovement ecologyRissa tridactylaseabird trackingUria lomvia

Identifiers

PMID30962879
PMCPMC6434605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.