Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30962709›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2019

Defining unmet clinical need across the pathway of brain tumor care: a patient and carer perspective.

William Sage, Rocío Fernández-Méndez, Anna Crofton, Michael J Gifford, Alexey Bannykh, Constantinos Chrysaphinis, Emma Tingley, Helen Bulbeck, Mita Brahmbhatt, John D Pickard and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical outcomes of the best supportive care-clinic for patients with high grade glioma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Living with glioblastoma - the need for integrated support based on experiences of chaos, loss of autonomy, and isolation in both patients and their relatives.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Analysis of Internet-Based Search Patterns Utilized by Glioma Patients as Information Source.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

William SageDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, will.a.sage@gmail.com.
Rocío Fernández-MéndezDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, will.a.sage@gmail.com.
Anna CroftonDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre, Liverpool, UK.
Michael J GiffordMountain Hare Consulting, London, UK.
Alexey BannykhMountain Hare Consulting, London, UK.
Constantinos ChrysaphinisThe Brain Tumour Charity, Farnborough, UK.
Emma TingleyThe Brain Tumour Charity, Farnborough, UK.
Helen BulbeckBrainstrust, Cowes, Isle of Wight, UK.
Mita BrahmbhattDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, will.a.sage@gmail.com.
John D PickardDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, will.a.sage@gmail.com.
Fiona M WalterPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Andrew BrodbeltDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen J PriceDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, will.a.sage@gmail.com.
Alexis J JoannidesDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, will.a.sage@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the experience of patients with brain tumors and their carers across distinct parts of their treatment pathway and identify their views on potential service gaps in need of addressing.

methodsA structured survey was administered at patient workshops across the UK and online through a charity newsletter. Answers to closed questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and open questions were examined using techniques of inductive content analysis.

resultsA total of 136 survey responses were received, representing patients with a variety of diagnoses and geographical locations (30 counties). There was a wide range of opinions on the provision of current neuro-oncology services. Key themes identified included a perceived lack of information provision, a gap in postdischarge psychological and neuropsychological supports, and an unmet willingness for involvement in research.

conclusionThis national survey enhances our knowledge of current patient and carer experience within neuro-oncology services. A number of areas of unmet clinical need are highlighted providing a basis for informing future patient-centered service improvements and research.

Indexed as

brain cancerbrain tumorsneuro-oncology pathwaypatient experience

Identifiers

PMID30962709
PMCPMC6433107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.