Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30962682›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2019

Exacerbations and health care resource use among patients with COPD in relation to blood eosinophil counts.

Hana Müllerová, Beth Hahn, Edgar P Simard, George Mu, Umur Hatipoğlu

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exacerbations and Healthcare Burden of COPD with Type 2 Inflammation: US Claims Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical And Economic Burden Of Eosinophilic COPD In A Large Retrospective US Cohort.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hana MüllerováReal-World Evidence, GSK, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK.
Beth HahnUS Medical Affairs, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, beth.a.hahn@gsk.com.
Edgar P SimardReal-World Data and Analytics, GSK, Upper Providence, PA, USA.
George MuReal-World Data and Analytics, GSK, Upper Providence, PA, USA.
Umur HatipoğluCenter for Comprehensive Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Current understanding of the relationship between COPD phenotype and health care resource utilization (HCRU) is limited. This real-world study evaluated disease burden and HCRU for COPD subgroups prone to exacerbation as defined by blood eosinophil (EOS) count and multiple inhaler triple therapy (MITT) use. Methods: This was a large-scale, retrospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study using data from the US IBM Watson Explorys real-world database (GSK Study HO-17-18395). The population of interest comprised patients with COPD ≥40 years of age with ≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbations (prior year) while on inhaled maintenance therapy, with ≥1 blood EOS count. Data were analyzed during the year prior to index date (last COPD encounter between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2016). Four subgroups were analyzed based on a combination of EOS counts (<150 and ≥150 cells/μL) and MITT use (receiving or not receiving). Among these groups, clinical characteristics, exacerbations, and HCRU were described. A sensitivity analysis that further stratified EOS into four categories (<150, ≥150-<300, ≥300-<500, and ≥500 cells/μL) was also performed. Results: The COPD population of interest comprised 34,268 patients. Subgroups with EOS ≥150 cells/μL vs <150 cells/μL had more comorbidities and experienced significantly higher mean numbers of moderate exacerbations (not receiving MITT, ≥150 cells/μL vs <150 cells/μL: 1.93 vs 1.82, Conclusion: Blood EOS ≥150/μL cells were associated with increased HCRU and higher exacerbation rates compared with EOS <150 cells/μL, irrespective of MITT use. COPD phenotyping using blood EOS could help identify candidates for additional therapies that target eosinophilic inflammatory pathways.

Indexed as

EosinophilsAdministration, InhalationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBronchodilator AgentsDatabases, FactualDisease ProgressionDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansLeukocyte CountLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBronchodilator AgentsCOPDeosinophilexacerbationhealth care resourcephenotype

Identifiers

PMID30962682
PMCPMC6435122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.