Trial reportInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2019
AMPLIFY: a randomized, Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of aclidinium/formoterol vs monocomponents and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-very severe symptomatic COPD.
Trial report in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02796677 (A 24 Week Treatment, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blinded, Double Dummy, Parallel-group, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg/Formoterol Fumarate 12 μg Fixed-dose Combination BID Compared With Each Monotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 24 Week Treatment, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blinded, Double Dummy, Parallel-group, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg/Formoterol Fumarate 12 μg Fixed-dose Combination BID Compared With Each Monotherapy (Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg BID and Formoterol Fumarate 12 μg BID) and Tiotropium 18 μg QD When Administered to Patients With Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Maintenance Therapy Strategies for Quality of Life in COPD: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Other Bronchodilators for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Association of tiotropium use and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Once-daily single-inhaler versus twice-daily multiple-inhaler triple therapy in patients with COPD: lung function and health status results from two replicate randomized controlled trials.Respiratory research · 2020Trial
- The Impact of Exacerbation History on the Safety and Efficacy of Aclidinium in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Increased Cardiovascular Risk: ASCENT-COPD Trial.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseTrial
- Effect of aclidinium bromide therapy on quality of life and symptoms of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis results of the Greek and Austrian ON-AIR real-world observational studies.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Observational
- Real-Life Effectiveness of Aclidinium/Formoterol on COPD Control: The REDACT Observational Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Observational
- New Perspectives on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022Article
- Use of the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms™ in COPD as an Outcome Measure in Clinical Trials: A Rapid Systematic Review.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2021Article
- 24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study.Advances in therapy · 2020Article
- Effectiveness and Tolerability of LABA/LAMA Fixed-Dose Combinations Aclidinium/Formoterol, Glycopyrronium/Indacaterol and Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in the Treatment of COPD in Daily Practice - Results of the Non-Interventional DETECT Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Observational
- Formoterol for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Review
- The future exacerbation and mortality of different inhalation therapies among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in various GOLD groups: a focus on the GOLD 2017 and GOLD 2023 reports.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: AMPLIFY assessed the efficacy and safety of aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate (AB/FF) vs its monocomponents and tiotropium (TIO) in patients with moderate-to-very severe symptomatic COPD (NCT02796677). Methods: In this 24-week, Phase III, double-dummy, active-controlled study, symptomatic patients (COPD Assessment Test score ≥10) were randomized to twice-daily AB/FF 400/12 µg, AB 400 µg, or FF 12 µg, or once-daily TIO 18 µg. Co-primary endpoints were change from baseline at week 24 in 1-hour morning post-dose FEV Results: A total of 1,594 patients were randomized; 566 entered the sub-study. At week 24, 1-hour post-dose FEV Conclusion: In patients with moderate-to-very severe symptomatic COPD, twice-daily AB/FF significantly improved lung function vs monocomponents and TIO, and early morning symptom control vs TIO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.