Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30962582›Full record

ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2019

A symmetric toggle switch explains the onset of random X inactivation in different mammals.

Verena Mutzel, Ikuhiro Okamoto, Ilona Dunkel, Mitinori Saitou, Luca Giorgetti, Edith Heard, Edda G Schulz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Stochasticity in genetics and gene regulation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The Molecular and Nuclear Dynamics of X-Chromosome Inactivation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Verena MutzelOtto Warburg Laboratories, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7237-0324
Ikuhiro OkamotoDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ilona DunkelOtto Warburg Laboratories, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.
Mitinori SaitouInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Luca GiorgettiFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Edith HeardInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3215, INSERM U934, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8052-7117
Edda G SchulzOtto Warburg Laboratories, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany. edda.schulz@molgen.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1253-6868
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics · DEKyoto University · JPCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRFriedrich Miescher Institute · CH

Funding

European Research Council 759366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene-regulatory networks control the establishment and maintenance of alternative gene-expression states during development. A particular challenge is the acquisition of opposing states by two copies of the same gene, as in the case of the long non-coding RNA Xist in mammals at the onset of random X-chromosome inactivation (XCI). The regulatory principles that lead to stable mono-allelic expression of Xist remain unknown. Here, we uncover the minimal regulatory network that can ensure female-specific and mono-alleleic upregulation of Xist, by combining mathematical modeling and experimental validation of central model predictions. We identify a symmetric toggle switch as the basis for random mono-allelic upregulation of Xist, which reproduces data from several mutant, aneuploid and polyploid mouse cell lines with various Xist expression patterns. Moreover, this toggle switch explains the diversity of strategies employed by different species at the onset of XCI. In addition to providing a unifying conceptual framework with which to explore XCI across mammals, our study sets the stage for identifying the molecular mechanisms needed to initiate random XCI.

Indexed as

X Chromosome InactivationAllelesAnimalsFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMaleMammalsRNA, Long NoncodingSpecies SpecificitySystems BiologyRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID30962582
PMCPMC6558282
OpenAlexW2931335101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.