Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30962449›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Comparative transcriptomics of social insect queen pheromones.

Luke Holman, Heikki Helanterä, Kalevi Trontti, Alexander S Mikheyev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Molecular Substrates of Insect Eusociality.Annual review of genetics · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Putting hornets on the genomic map.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular regulation of lifespan extension in fertile ant workers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Luke HolmanSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Melbourne, Australia. luke.holman@unimelb.edu.au.
Heikki HelanteräEcology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6468-5956
Kalevi TronttiDepartment of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, Helsinki, 00014, Finland.
Alexander S MikheyevResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia. alexander.mikheyev@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4369-1019
Australian National University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Queen pheromones are chemical signals that mediate reproductive division of labor in eusocial animals. Remarkably, queen pheromones are composed of identical or chemically similar compounds in some ants, wasps and bees, even though these taxa diverged >150MYA and evolved queens and workers independently. Here, we measure the transcriptomic consequences of experimental exposure to queen pheromones in workers from two ant and two bee species (genera: Lasius, Apis, Bombus), and test whether they are similar across species. Queen pheromone exposure affected transcription and splicing at many loci. Many genes responded consistently in multiple species, and the set of pheromone-sensitive genes was enriched for functions relating to lipid biosynthesis and transport, olfaction, production of cuticle, oogenesis, and histone (de)acetylation. Pheromone-sensitive genes tend to be evolutionarily ancient, positively selected, peripheral in the gene coexpression network, hypomethylated, and caste-specific in their expression. Our results reveal how queen pheromones achieve their effects, and suggest that ants and bees use similar genetic modules to achieve reproductive division of labor.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntsBeesBehavior, AnimalBiological EvolutionFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationPheromonesReproductionSequence Analysis, RNASocial BehaviorTranscriptomePheromones

Identifiers

PMID30962449
PMCPMC6453924
OpenAlexW2933162483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.