Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30962428›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

RNA editing is abundant and correlates with task performance in a social bumblebee.

Hagit T Porath, Esther Hazan, Hagai Shpigler, Mira Cohen, Mark Band, Yehuda Ben-Shahar, Erez Y Levanon, Eli Eisenberg, Guy Bloch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. RNA biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Lactobacillus for ribosome peptide editing cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hagit T PorathThe Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52900, Israel.
Esther HazanDepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Behavior, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel.
Hagai ShpiglerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Behavior, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel.
Mira CohenDepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Behavior, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel.
Mark BandRoy J Carver Biotechnology Center, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, 61801, IL, USA.
Yehuda Ben-ShaharDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, 63130-4899, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2956-2926
Erez Y LevanonThe Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52900, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3641-4198
Eli EisenbergRaymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel. elieis@post.tau.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8681-3202
Guy BlochDepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Behavior, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel. guy.bloch@mail.huji.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1624-4926
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILBar-Ilan University · ILTel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonies of the bumblebee Bombus terrestris are characterized by wide phenotypic variability among genetically similar full-sister workers, suggesting a major role for epigenetic processes. Here, we report a high level of ADAR-mediated RNA editing in the bumblebee, despite the lack of an ADAR1-homolog. We identify 1.15 million unique genomic sites, and 164 recoding sites residing in 100 protein coding genes, including ion channels, transporters, and receptors predicted to affect brain function and behavior. Some edited sites are similarly edited in other insects, cephalopods and even mammals. The global editing level of protein coding and non-coding transcripts weakly correlates with task performance (brood care vs. foraging), but not affected by dominance rank or juvenile hormone known to influence physiology and behavior. Taken together, our findings show that brain editing levels are high in naturally behaving bees, and may be regulated by relatively short-term effects associated with brood care or foraging activities.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAdenosine DeaminaseAnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalBrainEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGenetic VariationMaleRNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNA EditingSequence Analysis, RNAAdenosine DeaminaseRNARNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30962428
PMCPMC6453909
OpenAlexW2928449698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.