Reliability of the Cunningham Panel.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Infection-Associated Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome: A Review of Immunological Mechanisms, Clinical Phenotypes, and Therapeutic Strategies.Infectious disease reports · 2026
   Review
2. Cerebrospinal fluid characteristics of patients presenting for evaluation of pediatric acute-neuropsychiatric syndrome.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024
   Article
3. Immunological causes of obsessive-compulsive disorder: is it time for the concept of an "autoimmune OCD" subtype?Translational psychiatry · 2022
   Review
4. The Cunningham Panel: concerns remain.Translational psychiatry · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of autoimmune encephalopathy in children with autism.2018

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as