Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30962238›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2019

Role of comprehensive geriatric assessment in healthcare of older people in UK care homes: realist review.

Neil H Chadborn, Claire Goodman, Maria Zubair, Lídia Sousa, John R F Gladman, Tom Dening, Adam L Gordon

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Neil H ChadbornDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1368-7983
Claire GoodmanCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8938-4893
Maria ZubairFaculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9199-6576
Lídia SousaSanta Maria University Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
John R F GladmanDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8506-7786
Tom DeningDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3387-4241
Adam L GordonNational Institute of Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1676-9853
University of Nottingham · GBHospital de Santa Maria · PTManchester Metropolitan University · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

Department of Health 08/1809/231Department of Health 11/1021/02Department of Health HTA/13/75/01Department of Health PB-PG-0906-11387The Dunhill Medical Trust FOP1/0115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesComprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) may be a way to deliver optimal care for care home residents. We used realist review to develop a theory-driven account of how CGA works in care homes.

designRealist review.

settingCare homes.

methodsThe review had three stages: first, interviews with expert stakeholders and scoping of the literature to develop programme theories for CGA; second, iterative searches with structured retrieval and extraction of the literature; third, synthesis to refine the programme theory of how CGA works in care homes.We used the following databases: Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, PsychInfo, PubMed, Google Scholar, Greylit, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Institute.

results130 articles informed a programme theory which suggested CGA had three main components: structured comprehensive assessment, developing a care plan and working towards patient-centred goals. Each of these required engagement of a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Most evidence was available around assessment, with tension between structured assessment led by a single professional and less structured assessment involving multiple members of an MDT. Care planning needed to accommodate visiting clinicians and there was evidence that a core MDT often used care planning as a mechanism to seek external specialist support. Goal-setting processes were not always sufficiently patient-centred and did not always accommodate the views of care home staff. Studies reported improved outcomes from CGA affecting resident satisfaction, prescribing, healthcare resource use and objective measures of quality of care.

conclusionThe programme theory described here provides a framework for understanding how CGA could be effective in care homes. It will be of use to teams developing, implementing or auditing CGA in care homes. All three components are required to make CGA work-this may explain why attempts to implement CGA by interventions focused solely on assessment or care planning have failed in some long-term care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017062601.

Indexed as

AgedGeriatric AssessmentHomes for the AgedHumansNursing HomesPatient-Centered CareUnited Kingdomcare homescare planningcomprehensive geriatric assessmentgeriatric medicinemultidisciplinaryquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID30962238
PMCPMC6500328
OpenAlexW2937290393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.