SynthesisBMJ open2019
Role of comprehensive geriatric assessment in healthcare of older people in UK care homes: realist review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Managing clinical uncertainty in older people towards the end of life: a systematic review of person-centred tools.BMC palliative care · 2021Pooled it
- COVID-19 highlights the need for universal adoption of standards of medical care for physicians in nursing homes in Europe.European geriatric medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Cognitive, functional, physical, and nutritional status of the oldest old encountered in primary care: a systematic review.BMC family practice · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Understanding a Complex Intervention to Reduce Unplanned Hospitalizations From Nursing Homes: Process Evaluation of INTERCARE.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Root causes and fields of action to address unplanned hospitalisation in long-term care: a multiple case study with root-cause analysis.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: Addressing Unmet Healthcare Needs in Older Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Developing an initial programme theory for a model of social care in prisons and on release (empowered together): A realist synthesis approach.Medicine, science, and the law · 2025Article
- Development of planning of the integrated care for older people in China: a theory of change approach.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Teaching Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in medical education: a scoping review.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Geriatric Health Assessment Core Competencies and Skills for Primary Care Nurses: A Scoping Review.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Status of comprehensive geriatric assessment in hospital settings: a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Nurses' Clinical Practice in Nursing Homes: Depressive Symptoms and Fall Risk Assessment.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Does proactive care in care homes improve survival? A quality improvement project.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Frailty identification and management among Brazilian healthcare professionals: a survey.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Geriatric Assessment in CKD Care: An Implementation Study.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- IT-assisted comprehensive geriatric assessment for residents in care homes: quasi-experimental longitudinal study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Expectation, Attitude, and Barriers to Receiving Telehomecare Among Caregivers of Homebound or Bedridden Older Adults: Qualitative Study.JMIR aging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesComprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) may be a way to deliver optimal care for care home residents. We used realist review to develop a theory-driven account of how CGA works in care homes.
designRealist review.
settingCare homes.
methodsThe review had three stages: first, interviews with expert stakeholders and scoping of the literature to develop programme theories for CGA; second, iterative searches with structured retrieval and extraction of the literature; third, synthesis to refine the programme theory of how CGA works in care homes.We used the following databases: Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, PsychInfo, PubMed, Google Scholar, Greylit, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Institute.
results130 articles informed a programme theory which suggested CGA had three main components: structured comprehensive assessment, developing a care plan and working towards patient-centred goals. Each of these required engagement of a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Most evidence was available around assessment, with tension between structured assessment led by a single professional and less structured assessment involving multiple members of an MDT. Care planning needed to accommodate visiting clinicians and there was evidence that a core MDT often used care planning as a mechanism to seek external specialist support. Goal-setting processes were not always sufficiently patient-centred and did not always accommodate the views of care home staff. Studies reported improved outcomes from CGA affecting resident satisfaction, prescribing, healthcare resource use and objective measures of quality of care.
conclusionThe programme theory described here provides a framework for understanding how CGA could be effective in care homes. It will be of use to teams developing, implementing or auditing CGA in care homes. All three components are required to make CGA work-this may explain why attempts to implement CGA by interventions focused solely on assessment or care planning have failed in some long-term care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017062601.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.