Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30961544›Full record

SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2019

Effects of intravenous hydration on risk of contrast induced nephropathy and in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yong Liu, Daqing Hong, Amanda Ying Wang, Rui Guo, Brendan Smyth, Jin Liu, Guoli Sun, Shiqun Chen, Ning Tan, Meg Jardine and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Yong LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Daqing HongRenal Department, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Amanda Ying WangThe George Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia. awang@georgeinstitute.org.au.
Rui GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Brendan SmythThe George Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Jin LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Guoli SunDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shiqun ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ning TanDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Meg JardineThe George Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
David BriegerThe George Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Ahmed ShamanThe George Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Shariful IslamThe George Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Jiyan ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. chenjiyandr@126.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1216-9316
Martin GallagherThe George Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia. mgallagher@georgeinstitute.org.au.
The University of Sydney · AUGuangdong General Hospital · CNGuangdong University of Technology · CNSichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of intravenous hydration at the time of primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. Guidelines are vague, supported by low level evidence, and hydration is used less often than other clinical settings.To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials assessing intravenous hydration compared with non-hydration for prevention of contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) and In-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

methodsMedline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Register were searched to September 2018. Included studies reported the incidence of CIN, In-hospital mortality, requirement for dialysis and heart failure. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for individual trials were pooled using a random effects model.

resultsThree moderate quality trials were identified including 1074 patients. Overall, compared with no hydration, intravenous hydration significantly reduced the incidence of CIN by 42% (RR 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.74, p < 0.001). The estimated effects upon all-cause mortality (RR 0.56; 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.02, p = 0.057) and the requirement for dialysis (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.14-1.88, p = 0.462) were not statistically significant. The outcome of heart failure was not consistently reported.

conclusionsIntravenous hydration likely reduces the incidence of CIN in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. However, for key clinical outcomes such as mortality, heart failure and dialysis the effect estimates were imprecise. Further high quality studies are needed to clarify the appropriate volume of fluid and effects on outcomes.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyHospital MortalityAgedContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansIncidenceInfusions, IntravenousKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProtective FactorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRenal DialysisContrast MediaContrast-induced nephropathyIntravenous hydrationPrimary percutaneous coronary intervention, acute kidney injury, dialysis, mortalityST-segment elevation-myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID30961544
PMCPMC6454772
OpenAlexW2943552738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.