Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30961542›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Contraceptive use, prevalence and predictors of pregnancy planning among female sex workers in Uganda: a cross sectional study.

Justine Nnakate Bukenya, Rhoda K Wanyenze, Geraldine Barrett, Jennifer Hall, Fredrick Makumbi, David Guwatudde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Justine Nnakate BukenyaSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. jbukenya@musph.ac.ug.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9139-6183
Rhoda K WanyenzeSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Geraldine BarrettInstitute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Jennifer HallInstitute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Fredrick MakumbiSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
David GuwatuddeSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Makerere University · UGLondon Women's Clinic · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnintended pregnancies are associated with negative consequences to both mother and baby. Female Sex Workers (FSWs) are at high risk of unintended/unplanned pregnancies. However, prevalence of pregnancy planning and its predictors among FSWs has not been comprehensively investigated. This study was designed to determine contraceptive use, the prevalence, and predictors of pregnancy planning among FSWs in Uganda.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 819 FSWs attending most at risk populations initiative (MARPI) clinics were recruited using systematic sampling and interviewed with a pretested questionnaire that included collection of data on pregnancy intention using the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP). Data were analysed using STATA version 14.0. Multinomial logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of pregnancy planning,

resultsOf the 819 study participants, only 90 (11.0%) had planned pregnancies. Overall, 462 (56.4%) were hazardous alcohol users and 335 (40.9%) abused drugs; 172 (21.0%) had been raped in the last 2 years and 70 (40.7%) of these accessed emergency contraception post-rape. Dual contraception use (condom and other modern method) was 58.0%. Having a non-emotional partner as a man who impregnated the FSW compared to emotional partner was significantly associated with less planned relative to unplanned pregnancy, (aRR = 0.15 95%Cl =0.08, 0.30), so was lack of reported social support compared to support from friends, (aRR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.22-0.87), keeping all factors constant in the model. Being raped (aRR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.31-0.84) or abuse of substances (aRR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.45-0.93) were significantly associated with lower ambivalence relative to unplanned pregnancy but not with planned relative to unplanned pregnancy.

conclusionCompared to women in the general population, pregnancy planning was low among FSWs amidst modest use of dual contraceptive. There is an urgent need to promote dual contraception among FSWs to prevent unplanned pregnancies especially with non-emotional partners, drug users, and post-rape.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedPrevalenceRisk FactorsSexual PartnersSex WorkersFemale sex workersLow income countriesPredictorsPregnancy planningUganda

Identifiers

PMID30961542
PMCPMC6454679
OpenAlexW2945234977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.