Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30961521›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2019

A 16S rDNA PCR-based theoretical to actual delta approach on culturable mock communities revealed severe losses of diversity information.

Hellen Ribeiro Martins Dos Santos, Caio Suzart Argolo, Ronaldo Costa Argôlo-Filho, Leandro Lopes Loguercio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The prevalence and distribution ofFrontiers in microbiomes · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Establishment of a stable monoculture system forFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hellen Ribeiro Martins Dos SantosDepartment of Biological Sciences (DCB), State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Pav. Jorge Amado, Rod. BR 415, Km 16, Salobrinho, Ilhéus, BA, 45662-000, Brazil.
Caio Suzart ArgoloDepartment of Biological Sciences (DCB), State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Pav. Jorge Amado, Rod. BR 415, Km 16, Salobrinho, Ilhéus, BA, 45662-000, Brazil.
Ronaldo Costa Argôlo-FilhoDepartment of Biological Sciences (DCB), State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Pav. Jorge Amado, Rod. BR 415, Km 16, Salobrinho, Ilhéus, BA, 45662-000, Brazil. ronaldoargolo@yahoo.com.br.ORCID 0000-0002-0739-4634
Leandro Lopes LoguercioDepartment of Biological Sciences (DCB), State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Pav. Jorge Amado, Rod. BR 415, Km 16, Salobrinho, Ilhéus, BA, 45662-000, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubunits of ribosomal RNA genes (rDNAs) characterized by PCR-based protocols have been the proxy for studies in microbial taxonomy, phylogenetics, evolution and ecology. However, relevant factors have shown to interfere in the experimental outputs in a variety of systems. In this work, a 'theoretical' to 'actual' delta approach was applied to data on culturable mock bacterial communities (MBCs) to study the levels of losses in operational taxonomic units (OTUs) detectability. Computational and lab-bench strategies based on 16S rDNA amplification by 799F and U1492R primers were employed, using a fingerprinting method with highly improved detectability of fragments as a case-study tool. MBCs were of two major types: in silico MBCs, assembled with database-retrieved sequences, and in vitro MBCs, with AluI digestions of PCR data generated from culturable endophytes isolated from cacao trees.

resultsInterfering factors for the 16 s rDNA amplifications, such as the type of template, direct and nested PCR, proportion of chloroplast DNA from a tropical plant source (Virola officinalis), and biased-amplification by the primers resulted in altered bacterial 16S rDNA amplification, both on MBCs and V. officinalis leaf-extracted DNA. For the theoretical data, the maximum number of fragments for in silico and in vitro cuts were not significantly different from each other. Primers' preferences for certain sequences were detected, depending on the MBCs' composition prior to PCR. The results indicated overall losses from 2.3 up to 8.2 times in the number of OTUs detected from actual AluI digestions of MBCs when compared to in silico and in vitro theoretical data.

conclusionsDue to all those effects, the final amplification profile of the bacterial community assembled was remarkably simplified when compared to the expected number of detectable fragments known to be present in the MBC. From these findings, the scope of hypotheses generation and conclusions from experiments based on PCR amplifications of bacterial communities was discussed.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationMicrobiotaModels, TheoreticalBacteriaCacaoDNA, BacterialDNA FingerprintingDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalEndophytesPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAStem CellsDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rDNA metagenomicsARDRACAPSChimeric sequencesCommunity structureFingerprinting methodsHypervariable regionsMicrobial ecology and diversityPCR-RFLPPlant-associated bacteria

Identifiers

PMID30961521
PMCPMC6454784
OpenAlexW2946268385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.