ReviewPolymers2018
Natural Polymers for Organ 3D Bioprinting.
Review in Polymers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Precision Surgery: The Role of 3D Printing in Liver Surgery.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2026Article
- Biocompatible Stimuli-Sensitive Natural Hydrogels: Recent Advances in Biomedical Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Bioprinted Scaffolds for Biomimetic Applications: A State-of-the-Art Technology.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Harnessing native blueprints for designing bioinks to bioprint functional cardiac tissue.iScience · 2025Review
- Narrative Review and Guide: State of the Art and Emerging Opportunities of Bioprinting in Tissue Regeneration and Medical Instrumentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advanced tumor organoid bioprinting strategy for oncology research.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Scaffold-Mediated Drug Delivery for Enhanced Wound Healing: A Review.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Review
- Biofabrication methods for reconstructing extracellular matrix mimetics.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Plant Decellularization by Chemical and Physical Methods for Regenerative Medicine: A Review Article.Journal of medical signals and sensors · 2024Review
- Three Dimensional Bioprinting for Hepatic Tissue Engineering: From In Vitro Models to Clinical Applications.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2024Review
- Engineering 3D-Printed Advanced Healthcare Materials for Periprosthetic Joint Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Bioprinting in Microgravity.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023Review
- Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- New Photocrosslinked 3D Foamed Scaffolds Based on GelMA Copolymers: Potential Application in Bone Tissue Engineering.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Recent Developments in 3D Bio-Printing and Its Biomedical Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Formulation and evaluation of a bioink composed of alginate, gelatin, and nanocellulose for meniscal tissue engineering.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Functional engineering strategies of 3D printed implants for hard tissue replacement.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Review
- 3D Bioprinting for Pancreas Engineering/Manufacturing.Polymers · 2022Review
- Latest Advances in 3D Bioprinting of Cardiac Tissues.Advanced materials technologies · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, known as a promising technology for bioartificial organ manufacturing, has provided unprecedented versatility to manipulate cells and other biomaterials with precise control their locations in space. Over the last decade, a number of 3D bioprinting technologies have been explored. Natural polymers have played a central role in supporting the cellular and biomolecular activities before, during and after the 3D bioprinting processes. These polymers have been widely used as effective cell-loading hydrogels for homogeneous/heterogeneous tissue/organ formation, hierarchical vascular/neural/lymphatic network construction, as well as multiple biological/biochemial/physiological/biomedical/pathological functionality realization. This review aims to cover recent progress in natural polymers for bioartificial organ 3D bioprinting. It is structured as introducing the important properties of 3D printable natural polymers, successful models of 3D tissue/organ construction and typical technologies for bioartificial organ 3D bioprinting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.