Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30961051›Full record

ArticlePolymers2018

Chromatin Loop Extrusion and Chromatin Unknotting.

Dusan Racko, Fabrizio Benedetti, Dimos Goundaroulis, Andrzej Stasiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multidrug Resistance: Are We Still Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dynamics of chromosome organization in a minimal bacterial cell.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. DNA topoisomerases: Advances in understanding of cellular roles and multi-protein complexes via structure-function analysis.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dusan RackoCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. Dusan.Racko@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-9203-9652
Fabrizio BenedettiCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. Fabrizio.Benedetti@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-9959-9142
Dimos GoundaroulisCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. dimoklis.gkountaroulis@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-2874-6272
Andrzej StasiakCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. Andrzej.Stasiak@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-0398-1989

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RP2013-K-017Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_166684.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been a puzzle how decondensed interphase chromosomes remain essentially unknotted. The natural expectation is that in the presence of type II DNA topoisomerases that permit passages of double-stranded DNA regions through each other, all chromosomes should reach the state of topological equilibrium. The topological equilibrium in highly crowded interphase chromosomes forming chromosome territories would result in formation of highly knotted chromatin fibres. However, Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) methods revealed that the decay of contact probabilities with the genomic distance in interphase chromosomes is practically the same as in the crumpled globule state that is formed when long polymers condense without formation of any knots. To remove knots from highly crowded chromatin, one would need an active process that should not only provide the energy to move the system from the state of topological equilibrium but also guide topoisomerase-mediated passages in such a way that knots would be efficiently unknotted instead of making the knots even more complex. We perform coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of the process of chromatin loop extrusion involving knotted and catenated chromatin fibres to check whether chromatin loop extrusion may be involved in active unknotting of chromatin fibres. Our simulations show that the process of chromatin loop extrusion is ideally suited to actively unknot, decatenate and demix chromatin fibres in interphase chromosomes.

Indexed as

biopolymerschromatinchromatin loop extrusionchromosomescohesinDNA knotsDNA topoisomerases

Identifiers

PMID30961051
PMCPMC6403842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.