Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30960983›Full record

ArticlePolymers2018

Cellulose⁻Chitosan Antibacterial Composite Films Prepared from LiBr Solution.

Jiwook Yang, Gu-Joong Kwon, Kyojung Hwang, Dae-Young Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiwook YangDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University-Ilsan, Biomedical Campus, Goyang-si, Ilsandong-gu 10326, Korea. jwjii0@naver.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-1418
Gu-Joong KwonThe Institute of Forest Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon Campus, 1 Gangwondaehakgil, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do 24341, Korea. gjkwon@kangwon.ac.kr.
Kyojung HwangDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University-Ilsan, Biomedical Campus, Goyang-si, Ilsandong-gu 10326, Korea. kyojung7@naver.com.
Dae-Young KimDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University-Ilsan, Biomedical Campus, Goyang-si, Ilsandong-gu 10326, Korea. sbpkim@dongguk.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulose and chitosan solutions were prepared in 60% LiBr and mixed with a different weight ratio. The washing and drying of the prepared cellulose⁻chitosan composite films were performed under identical conditions. The color of the liquefied mixtures and films was initially transparent but changed from colorless to brownish yellow depending on the ratio of chitosan in the solution. The cross section observed in the SEM results indicated that the film developed with a higher ratio of chitosan was more robust and possessed greater antibacterial properties. FT-IR analysis of the films showed that hydrogen bonds between cellulose and chitosan in composite films were successfully achieved and retained excellent mechanical properties. The proper ratio of chitosan in the cellulose solution can increase the tensile strength and improve the elongation of the films; however, the E-modulus property was consistently reduced. The antibacterial activity and mechanical properties of the films were greatly improved as the amount of chitosan in the film increased.

Indexed as

antibacterialcellulosechitosancompositeLiBr

Identifiers

PMID30960983
PMCPMC6403986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.