Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30960966›Full record

ArticlePolymers2018

3D Printed Polymeric Hydrogels for Nerve Regeneration.

Binoy Maiti, David Díaz Díaz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Perspectives on 3D Bioprinting of Peripheral Nerve Conduits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Machine intelligence for nerve conduit design and production.Journal of biological engineering · 2020
    Review
  10. Natural-Based Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Injury Repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Imaging in the repair of peripheral nerve injury.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Binoy MaitiInstitute of Organic Chemistry, University of Regensburg, Universitätstr. 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. binoymaiti1@gmail.com.
David Díaz DíazInstitute of Organic Chemistry, University of Regensburg, Universitätstr. 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. David.Diaz@chemie.uni-regensburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0557-3364
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human nervous system lacks an inherent ability to regenerate its components upon damage or diseased conditions. During the last decade, this has motivated the development of a number of strategies for nerve regeneration. However, most of those approaches have not been used in clinical applications till today. For instance, although biomaterial-based scaffolds have been extensively used for nerve reparation, the lack of more customized structures have hampered their use in vivo. This highlight focuses mainly on how 3D bioprinting technology, using polymeric hydrogels as bio-inks, can be used for the development of new nerve guidance channels or devices for peripheral nerve cell regeneration. In this concise contribution, some of the most recent and representative examples are highlighted to discuss the challenges involved in various aspects of 3D bioprinting for nerve cell regeneration, specifically when using polymeric hydrogels.

Indexed as

3D printingnerve regenerationpolymeric hydrogels

Identifiers

PMID30960966
PMCPMC6403752
OpenAlexW2890490367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.