Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30960885›Full record

ReviewPolymers2018

Polyphilicity-An Extension of the Concept of Amphiphilicity in Polymers.

Daniel Heinz, Elkin Amado, Jörg Kressler

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hydrophilic Polymers.Polymers · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel HeinzDepartment of Chemistry, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, D-06099 Halle (Saale), Germany. daniel.heinz@chemie.uni-halle.de.
Elkin AmadoDepartment of Chemistry, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, D-06099 Halle (Saale), Germany. elkin.amado@chemie.uni-halle.de.
Jörg KresslerDepartment of Chemistry, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, D-06099 Halle (Saale), Germany. joerg.kressler@chemie.uni-halle.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8571-5985
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KR1714/8-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments in synthetic pathways as simple reversible-deactivation radical polymerization (RDRP) techniques and quantitative post-polymerization reactions, most notoriously 'click' reactions, leading to segmented copolymers, have broadened the molecular architectures accessible to polymer chemists as a matter of routine. Segments can be blocks, grafted chains, branchings, telechelic end-groups, covalently attached nanoparticles, nanodomains in networks, even sequences of random copolymers, and so on. In this review, we describe the variety of the segmented synthetic copolymers landscape from the point of view of their chemical affinity, or synonymous philicity, in bulk or with their surroundings, such as solvents, permeant gases, and solid surfaces. We focus on recent contributions, current trends, and perspectives regarding polyphilic copolymers, which have, in addition to hydrophilic and lipophilic segments, other philicities, for example, towards solvents, fluorophilic entities, ions, silicones, metals, nanoparticles, and liquid crystalline moieties.

Indexed as

amphiphilicityblock copolymersfluorophilicgraft copolymershydrophiliclipophilicpolyphilicityself-assemblyterpolymerstriphilic

Identifiers

PMID30960885
PMCPMC6403972
OpenAlexW2889525976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.