ArticlePolymers2019
Preparation and Characterization of Magadiite⁻Magnetite Nanocomposite with Its Sorption Performance Analyses on Removal of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solutions.
Article in Polymers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol/Jackfruit Peel Carboxymethylcellulose/Graphene Oxide/Kaolin Composite Hydrogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Design of GdMikrochimica acta · 2021Article
- Cationic Dye Removal Using Novel Magnetic/Activated Charcoal/β-Cyclodextrin/Alginate Polymer Nanocomposite.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Investigation on the Preparation and Properties of CMC/magadiite Nacre-Like Nanocomposite Films.Polymers · 2019Article
- The High Efficiency of Anionic Dye Removal Using Ce-AlMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The magadiite⁻magnetite (MAG⁻Fe₃O₄) nanocomposite has great potential applications in the field of biomaterials research. It has been used as a novel magnetic sorbent, prepared by co-precipitation method. It has the dual advantage of having the magnetism of Fe₃O₄ and the high adsorption capacity of pure magadiite (MAG). MAG⁻Fe₃O₄ was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The results showed that Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles were deposited on the interlayer and surface of magadiite. MAG⁻Fe₃O₄ was treated as an adsorbent for methylene blue (MB) removal from aqueous solutions. The adsorption properties of MAG⁻Fe₃O₄ were investigated on methylene blue; however, the results showed that the adsorption performance of MAG⁻Fe₃O₄ improved remarkably compared with MA and Fe₃O₄. The adsorption capacity of MAG⁻Fe₃O₄ and the removal ratio of methylene blue were 93.7 mg/g and 96.2%, respectively (at 25 °C for 60 min, pH = 7, methylene blue solution of 100 mg/L, and the adsorbent dosage 1 g/L). In this research, the adsorption experimental data were fitted and well described using a pseudo-second-order kinetic model and a Langmuir adsorption isotherm model. The research results further showed that the adsorption performance of MAG⁻Fe₃O₄ was better than that of MAG and Fe₃O₄. Moreover, the adsorption behavior of MB on MAG⁻Fe₃O₄ was investigated to fit well in the pseudo-second-order kinetic model with the adsorption kinetics. The authors also concluded that the isothermal adsorption was followed by the Langmuir adsorption isotherm model; however, it was found that the adsorption of the MAG⁻Fe₃O₄ nanocomposite was a monolayer adsorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.