Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30960551›Full record

ArticlePolymers2019

Comparison of Membrane Inlet and Capillary Introduction Miniature Mass Spectrometry for Liquid Analysis.

Wenyan Shi, Xinqiong Lu, Jinbo Zhang, Jianhong Zhao, Lili Yang, Quan Yu, Xiaohao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Chemistry for Developing Countries: Mass Spectrometry.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenyan ShiDivision of Advanced Manufacturing, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China. shiwenyanu@163.com.
Xinqiong LuDivision of Advanced Manufacturing, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China. xqlu@tsinghua.info.
Jinbo ZhangDivision of Advanced Manufacturing, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China. zhangjb16@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn.
Jianhong ZhaoDivision of Advanced Manufacturing, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China. jh-zhao17@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn.
Lili YangHebei Province Key Lab of Measurement Technology and Instrumentation, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China. lily@ysu.net.cn.
Quan YuDivision of Advanced Manufacturing, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China. yu.quan@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-6995-6583
Xiaohao WangDivision of Advanced Manufacturing, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China. xhwang@tsinghua.edu.cn.

Funding

Key Technology R&D Program of Qinhuangdao 201501B053National Natural Science Foundation of China 21775085Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program JCYJ20160428182352200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) is commonly used for detecting the components in liquid samples. When a liquid sample flows through a membrane, certain analytes will permeate into the vacuum chamber of a mass spectrometer from the solution. The properties of the membrane directly determine the substances that can be detected by MIMS. A capillary introduction (CI) method we previously proposed can also be used to analyze gas and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) dissolved in liquids. When CI analysis is carried out, the sample is drawn into the mass spectrometer with no species discrimination. The performance of these two injection methods was compared in this study, and similar response time and limit of detection (LOD) can be acquired. Specifically, MIMS can provide better detection sensitivity for most inorganic gases and volatile organic compounds. In contrast, capillary introduction shows wider compatibility on analyte types and quantitative range, and it requires less sample consumption. As the two injection methods have comparable characteristics and can be coupled with a miniature mass spectrometer, factors such as cost, pollution, device size, and sample consumption should be comprehensively considered when choosing a satisfactory injection method in practical applications.

Indexed as

capillary introductionmass spectrometrymembrane inletperformance comparison

Identifiers

PMID30960551
PMCPMC6473344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.