Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30960469›Full record

ArticlePolymers2019

A Phenomenological Approach to Study Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Porous Structures Processed Using Supercritical CO₂.

Antonio Tabernero, Lucia Baldino, Stefano Cardea, Eva Martín Del Valle, Ernesto Reverchon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonio TaberneroDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Plaza los Caídos s/n, 37008 Salamanca (SA), Spain. antaber@usal.es.
Lucia BaldinoDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy. lbaldino@unisa.it.ORCID 0000-0001-7015-0803
Stefano CardeaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy. scardea@unisa.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5415-4828
Eva Martín Del ValleDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Plaza los Caídos s/n, 37008 Salamanca (SA), Spain. emvalle@usal.es.
Ernesto ReverchonDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy. ereverchon@unisa.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work proposes a modeling of the mechanical properties of porous polymers processed by scCO₂, using a phenomenological approach. Tensile and compression tests of alginate/gelatin and cellulose acetate/graphene oxide were modeled using three hyperelastic equations, derived from strain energy functions. The proposed hyperelastic equations provide a fair good fit for mechanical behavior of the nanofibrous system alginate/gelatin (deviations lower than 10%); whereas, due to the presence of the solid in the polymer network, a four-parameter model must be used to fit the composite cellulose acetate/graphene oxide behavior. Larger deviations from the experimental data were observed for the system cellulose acetate/graphene oxide because of its microporous structure. A finite element method was, then, proposed to model both systems; it allowed a realistic description of observable displacements and effective stresses. The results indicate that materials processed using scCO₂, when submitted to large stresses, do not obey Hooke´s law and must be considered as hyperelastic.

Indexed as

hyperelasticityOgdenstrain energy functionssupercritical CO2Yeoh

Identifiers

PMID30960469
PMCPMC6473646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.