Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30960351›Full record

ArticlePolymers2019

Enhancing X-ray Attenuation of 3D Printed Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) Hydrogels Utilizing Gold Nanoparticles for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.

Nehar Celikkin, Simone Mastrogiacomo, X Frank Walboomers, Wojciech Swieszkowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Detecting and Monitoring Hydrogels with Medical Imaging.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021
    Review
  12. Biomaterials for Orthopaedic Diagnostics and Theranostics.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Applications of nanotechnology in 3D printed tissue engineering scaffolds.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nehar CelikkinFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-661 Warszawa, Poland. neharcelikkin@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4216-9974
Simone MastrogiacomoRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Biomaterials, Philips van Leijdenlaan 25, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. simone.mastrogiacomo@nih.gov.
X Frank WalboomersRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Biomaterials, Philips van Leijdenlaan 25, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. frank.walboomers@radboudumc.nl.
Wojciech SwieszkowskiFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-661 Warszawa, Poland. wojciech.swieszkowski@pw.edu.pl.
Warsaw University of Technology · PLNational Institutes of Health · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions 607868Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju 306888 POL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone tissue engineering is a rapidly growing field which is currently progressing toward clinical applications. Effective imaging methods for longitudinal studies are critical to evaluating the new bone formation and the fate of the scaffolds. Computed tomography (CT) is a prevailing technique employed to investigate hard tissue scaffolds; however, the CT signal becomes weak in mainly-water containing materials, which hinders the use of CT for hydrogels-based materials. Nevertheless, hydrogels such as gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) are widely used for tissue regeneration due to their optimal biological properties and their ability to induce extracellular matrix formation. To date, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been suggested as promising contrast agents, due to their high X-ray attenuation, biocompatibility, and low toxicity. In this study, the effects of different sizes and concentrations of AuNPs on the mechanical properties and the cytocompatibility of the bulk GelMA-AuNPs scaffolds were evaluated. Furthermore, the enhancement of CT contrast with the cytocompatible size and concentration of AuNPs were investigated. 3D printed GelMA and GelMA-AuNPs scaffolds were obtained and assessed for the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). Lastly, 3D printed GelMA and GelMA-AuNPs scaffolds were scanned in a bone defect utilizing µCT as the proof of concept that the GelMA-AuNPs are good candidates for bone tissue engineering with enhanced visibility for µCT imaging.

Indexed as

3D printed gelatin methacrylate hydrogelscontrast agent for CT imaginggold nanoparticlesµCT imaging

Identifiers

PMID30960351
PMCPMC6419199
OpenAlexW2915920386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.