Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30960066›Full record

ReviewPolymers2019

Protein⁻Polyelectrolyte Interaction: Thermodynamic Analysis Based on the Titration Method

Xiaohan Wang, Kai Zheng, Yi Si, Xuhong Guo, Yisheng Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cationic Nanostructures for Vaccines Design.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaohan WangState-Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China. ellery9381@foxmail.com.
Kai ZhengState-Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China. ZKai3824@163.com.
Yi SiInstitute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin road, Shanghai 200032, China. sysiy@gmail.com.
Xuhong GuoState-Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China. guoxuhong@ecust.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-1792-8564
Yisheng XuState-Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China. yshxu@ecust.edu.cn.
East China University of Science and Technology · CNShihezi University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

111 Project Grant B08021International One belt One Road Collaboration Project of Shanghai 18490740300National Natural Science Foundation of China 21676089, 81470581Shanghai Talent Development Fund 2017038the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 222201717013, 22221818014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review discussed the mechanisms including theories and binding stages concerning the protein⁻polyelectrolyte (PE) interaction, as well as the applications for both complexation and coacervation states of protein⁻PE pairs. In particular, this review focused on the applications of titration techniques, that is, turbidimetric titration and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), in understanding the protein⁻PE binding process. To be specific, by providing thermodynamic information such as pH

Indexed as

complexationelectrostaticsisothermal titration calorimetrypolyelectrolytethermodynamic analysis

Identifiers

PMID30960066
PMCPMC6402006
OpenAlexW2906759355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.