Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30960018›Full record

ArticlePolymers2018

Roughness and Fiber Fraction Dominated Wetting of Electrospun Fiber-Based Porous Meshes.

Piotr K Szewczyk, Daniel P Ura, Sara Metwally, Joanna Knapczyk-Korczak, Marcin Gajek, Mateusz M Marzec, Andrzej Bernasik, Urszula Stachewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Acceleration of Electrospun PLA Degradation by Addition of Gelatin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Piotr K SzewczykInternational Centre of Electron Microscopy for Materials Science, Faculty of Metals Engineering and Industrial Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland. pszew@agh.edu.pl.
Daniel P UraInternational Centre of Electron Microscopy for Materials Science, Faculty of Metals Engineering and Industrial Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland. urad@agh.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-6330-6873
Sara MetwallyInternational Centre of Electron Microscopy for Materials Science, Faculty of Metals Engineering and Industrial Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland. metwally@agh.edu.pl.
Joanna Knapczyk-KorczakInternational Centre of Electron Microscopy for Materials Science, Faculty of Metals Engineering and Industrial Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland. jknapczyk@agh.edu.pl.
Marcin GajekFaculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland. mgajek@agh.edu.pl.
Mateusz M MarzecAcademic Centre for Materials and Nanotechnology, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland. marzecm@agh.edu.pl.
Andrzej BernasikAcademic Centre for Materials and Nanotechnology, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland. bernasik@agh.edu.pl.
Urszula StachewiczInternational Centre of Electron Microscopy for Materials Science, Faculty of Metals Engineering and Industrial Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland. ustachew@agh.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-5102-8685

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2014/15/D/ST5/02598Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2015/18/E/ST5/00230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wettability of electrospun fibers is one of the key parameters in the biomedical and filtration industry. Within this comprehensive study of contact angles on three-dimensional (3D) meshes made of electrospun fibers and films, from seven types of polymers, we clearly indicated the importance of roughness analysis. Surface chemistry was analyzed with X-ray photoelectron microscopy (XPS) and it showed no significant difference between fibers and films, confirming that the hydrophobic properties of the surfaces can be enhanced by just roughness without any chemical treatment. The surface geometry was determining factor in wetting contact angle analysis on electrospun meshes. We noted that it was very important how the geometry of electrospun surfaces was validated. The commonly used fiber diameter was not necessarily a convincing parameter unless it was correlated with the surface roughness or fraction of fibers or pores. Importantly, this study provides the guidelines to verify the surface free energy decrease with the fiber fraction for the meshes, to validate the changes in wetting contact angles. Eventually, the analysis suggested that meshes could maintain the entrapped air between fibers, decreasing surface free energies for polymers, which increased the contact angle for liquids with surface tension above the critical Wenzel level to maintain the Cassie-Baxter regime for hydrophobic surfaces.

Indexed as

contact angleelectrospinningfiberfractionroughnesssurface free energywetting

Identifiers

PMID30960018
PMCPMC6401689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.