Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30959882›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

The Role of Motor Learning on Measures of Physical Requirements and Motor Variability During Repetitive Screwing.

Tessy Luger, Robert Seibt, Monika A Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Robotic Assistance With Specialized Timing Improves Motor Performance: Implications for Movement Training.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tessy LugerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital and University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074 Tübingen, Germany. tessy.luger@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5718-251X
Robert SeibtInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital and University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074 Tübingen, Germany. robert.seibt@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Monika A RiegerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital and University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074 Tübingen, Germany. monika.rieger@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7855-3663
Benjamin SteinhilberInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital and University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074 Tübingen, Germany. benjamin.steinhilber@med.uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated whether physical requirements and motor variability decreased over days in novices during a repetitive screwing task. Fifty-seven subjects performed one hour of repetitive screwing and fastening on three days, separated by 2⁻7 days. The average physical requirement and relative cycle-to-cycle variability (coefficient of variation, i.e., CV) were calculated from continuous recordings of electromyography of four arm muscles (biceps brachii, triceps brachii, flexor carpi radialis, extensor digitorum), forearm acceleration, and electrocardiography. Muscle activity levels, heart rate, and forearm acceleration decreased from day 1 to day 2 (range: ~4% to ~20%) and/or 3 (range: ~4% to ~28%). Not all muscles showed a similar pattern. Activity of the extensor digitorum and biceps brachii decreased already between days 1 and 2 (range: ~6% to ~13%), whereas activity of the flexor carpi radialis and triceps brachii decreased between days 1 and 3 (range: ~13% to ~20%). No changes in physical requirement were detected between days 2 and 3. Relative motor variability did not change across days, except that variability of forearm acceleration increased from day 1 to 3 (~5%). This study found consistent changes in physical requirements and indicated that several arm muscles show earlier decreases of muscular activity, like the extensor digitorum, compared to other body parts, like the flexor carpi radialis. Moreover, movement strategies may develop differently than muscle activation strategies, based on the different developments of physical requirements and motor variability. The development of physical requirements in industrial tasks is part of daily living and starts at task onset, highlighting the importance of task familiarization and the randomization of experimental conditions in scientific studies.

Indexed as

AdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementMuscle, SkeletalTask Performance and AnalysisUpper ExtremityYoung Adultelectrocardiographyelectromyography (EMG)experiencekinematicsmanual materials handlingmotor control

Identifiers

PMID30959882
PMCPMC6479693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.