Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30959527›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2019

Association Among Dietary Supplement Use, Nutrient Intake, and Mortality Among U.S. Adults: A Cohort Study.

Fan Chen, Mengxi Du, Jeffrey B Blumberg, Kenneth Kwan Ho Chui, Mengyuan Ruan, Gail Rogers, Zhilei Shan, Luxian Zeng, Fang Fang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Insights into dietary supplements as popular product supporting the diet.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fan ChenFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, and Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts (F.C.).
Mengxi DuFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts (M.D., J.B.B., L.Z., F.F.Z.).
Jeffrey B BlumbergFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts (M.D., J.B.B., L.Z., F.F.Z.).
Kenneth Kwan Ho ChuiTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts (K.K.H.).
Mengyuan RuanFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy and School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts (M.R.).
Gail RogersFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy and Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts (G.R.).
Zhilei ShanFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Z.S.).
Luxian ZengFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts (M.D., J.B.B., L.Z., F.F.Z.).
Fang Fang ZhangFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts (M.D., J.B.B., L.Z., F.F.Z.).

Funding

Comparative and Cost-Effectiveness of Population Strategies to Improve Diet and Reduce CancerR01MD011501 · NIMHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI ZHANG, FANG FANG · 2016 to 2019
$2.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The health benefits and risks of dietary supplement use are controversial. Objective: To evaluate the association among dietary supplement use, levels of nutrient intake from foods and supplements, and mortality among U.S. adults. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) data from 1999 to 2010, linked to National Death Index mortality data. Participants: 30 899 U.S. adults aged 20 years or older who answered questions on dietary supplement use. Measurements: Dietary supplement use in the previous 30 days and nutrient intake from foods and supplements. Outcomes included mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer. Results: During a median follow-up of 6.1 years, 3613 deaths occurred, including 945 CVD deaths and 805 cancer deaths. Ever-use of dietary supplements was not associated with mortality outcomes. Adequate intake (at or above the Estimated Average Requirement or the Adequate Intake level) of vitamin A, vitamin K, magnesium, zinc, and copper was associated with reduced all-cause or CVD mortality, but the associations were restricted to nutrient intake from foods. Excess intake of calcium was associated with increased risk for cancer death (above vs. at or below the Tolerable Upper Intake Level: multivariable-adjusted rate ratio, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.07 to 2.45]; multivariable-adjusted rate difference, 1.7 [CI, -0.1 to 3.5] deaths per 1000 person-years), and the association seemed to be related to calcium intake from supplements (≥1000 mg/d vs. no use: multivariable-adjusted rate ratio, 1.53 [CI, 1.04 to 2.25]; multivariable-adjusted rate difference, 1.5 [CI, -0.1 to 3.1] deaths per 1000 person-years) rather than foods. Limitations: Results from observational data may be affected by residual confounding. Reporting of dietary supplement use is subject to recall bias. Conclusion: Use of dietary supplements is not associated with mortality benefits among U.S. adults. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsEnergy IntakeAdultCalcium, DietaryCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNutrition SurveysUnited StatesVitaminsCalcium, DietaryVitamins

Identifiers

PMID30959527
PMCPMC6736694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.