ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2019
Small gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the duodenum causing a life-threatening bleeding - A case report and review of the literature.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whipple procedure for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A report of two cases.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Brunner's Gland Hamartoma of the Duodenum: A Literature Review.Advances in therapy · 2021Review
- Imatinib and nutritional support can make successful treatment for a case of huge liver metastasis of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor that initially showed jaundice and cachexia.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDuodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (DGISTs) are mesenchymal tumors. Main presenting symptoms are gastrointestinal bleeding and non-specific abdominal pain. Surgical treatment is golden standard for treatment of DGISTs. Tumour location and size determine the surgical strategy. Recurrence rate depends on tumour location and completeness on removal. PRESENTATION OF CASE: 75 years old male fell ill with hematemesis, hemohesia and dizziness. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) did not reveal the source of bleeding. Upon admission, a second EGD was performed due to loss of consciousness and anaemia, which revealed only approximate source of bleeding in the third portion of the duodenum. The exact bleeding spot could not be reached and bleeding could not be controlled endoscopically. Patient was transferred to the operating room for an emergency explorative laparotomy. After extensive mobilisation of the duodenum a 2 × 2 cm intraluminal tumour with central bleeding ulceration was found in D3. The diseased part of the duodenum was excised and the duodenotomy was closed with interrupted sutures. Final pathohistological report confirmed gastrointestinal stromal tumour, pT1. Postoperative period was uneventful. DISCUSSION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours are most common in males aged 60-65 years. Surgical treatment is a golden standard. Surgical approach depends upon tumor location and size. In case of major bleeding surgical procedure is lifesaving and diagnostics for staging purposes are omitted.
conclusionGastrointestinal stromal tumors are a potential source of life-threatening bleeding. In such cases an emergency operation is often indicated with aim to remove the tumour en bloc and achieve hemostasis as soon as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.