Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30959195›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Creativity slumps and bumps: Examining the neurobehavioral basis of creativity development during middle childhood.

Manish Saggar, Hua Xie, Roger E Beaty, Atanas D Stankov, Meredith Schreier, Allan L Reiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manish SaggarDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 4305, USA. Electronic address: saggar@stanford.edu.
Hua XieDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 4305, USA.
Roger E BeatyDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16803, USA.
Atanas D StankovDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 4305, USA.
Meredith SchreierDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 4305, USA.
Allan L ReissDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 4305, USA.

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research (SCCTER)UL1UL1TR000093 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2012 to 2013
$6.5M
Quantifying the Fluctuations of Intrinsic Brain Activity in Healthy and Patient PopulationsR00MH104605 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAGGAR, MANISH · 2017 to 2019
$747k
Quantifying the Fluctuations of Intrinsic Brain Activity in Healthy and Patient PopulationsK99MH104605 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAGGAR, MANISH · 2015 to 2016
$244k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000093NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH104605NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH104605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental research has found that children's creative thinking ability tends to decline during middle childhood. However, this decline has not been consistently demonstrated, and the underlying neural and behavioral factors that affect fluctuations in children's creative thinking ability remain uncharacterized. Using a longitudinal cohort-sequential experimental design, we investigated the neurobehavioral basis of creative thinking ability during middle childhood in a sample of 48 children (n = 21 starting 3rd grade, n = 27 starting 4th grade) assessed longitudinally at three time-points across one year. For the first time, we used data-driven methods to reveal distinct trajectories in creative thinking ability during middle childhood. We found that although some children show a classic decline in creative ability, others exhibit a significant increase in creativity over time. These trajectories were not associated with differences in intelligence, age, or sex, but rather other developmentally-relevant constructs, including heightened externalizing behavior (i.e., rule-breaking and aggression). Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in a smaller cohort (n = 26), we examined longitudinal changes in bilateral frontal neural connectivity and found that increased right lateral frontal segregation or functional specialization tracked developmental improvements in creative thinking ability. Taken together, the findings reveal distinct profiles of change in creative thinking ability during middle childhood and identify behavioral and neural mechanisms potentially underlying changes in children's ability to think creatively.

Indexed as

CreativityBrain MappingChildChild DevelopmentFemaleFrontal LobeHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeural PathwaysSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredCreativityDevelopmental changesNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID30959195
PMCPMC6559841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.