Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30959110›Full record

ArticleInsect biochemistry and molecular biology2019

Small RNA responses of Culex mosquitoes and cell lines during acute and persistent virus infection.

Claudia Rückert, Abhishek N Prasad, Selene M Garcia-Luna, Alexis Robison, Nathan D Grubaugh, James Weger-Lucarelli, Gregory D Ebel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insect biochemistry and molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SFTSV NSs protein is a tick antiviral RNAi response suppressor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterization of Viral Interference inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Positive-strand RNA viruses-a Keystone Symposia report.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Viruses · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia RückertDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. Electronic address: claudia.rueckert@colostate.edu.
Abhishek N PrasadDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA; Department of Pathology, Galveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Selene M Garcia-LunaDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA; Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Alexis RobisonDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Nathan D GrubaughDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA; Yale School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Laboratory of Epidemiology of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
James Weger-LucarelliDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Gregory D EbelDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. Electronic address: gregory.ebel@colostate.edu.
Colorado State University · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Quasispecies dynamics in arbovirus persistence emergence and fitnessR01AI067380 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Gregory David Ebel · 2007 to 2026
$7.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA interference is a crucial antiviral mechanism in arthropods, including in mosquito vectors of arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses). Although the exogenous small interfering RNA (siRNA) pathway constitutes an efficient antiviral response in mosquitoes, virus-derived P-element induced wimpy testis (PIWI)-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) have been implicated in the response to alpha-, bunya- and flaviviruses in Aedes spp. mosquitoes. Culex mosquitoes transmit several medically important viruses including West Nile virus (WNV), but are considerably less well studied than Aedes mosquitoes and little is known about antiviral RNA interference in Culex mosquitoes. Therefore, we sequenced small RNA (sRNA) libraries from different Culex cell lines and tissues infected with WNV. The clear majority of virus-derived sRNA reads were 21 nt siRNAs in all cell lines and tissues tested, with no evidence for a role of WNV-derived piRNAs. Additionally, we aligned sRNA reads from Culex quinquefasciatus Hsu cells to the insect-specific rhabdovirus, Merida virus, which persistently replicates in these cells. We found that a significant proportion of the sRNA response to Merida virus consisted of piRNAs. Since viral DNA forms have been implicated in siRNA and piRNA responses of Aedes spp. mosquitoes, we also tested for viral DNA forms in WNV infected Culex cells. We detected viral DNA in Culex tarsalis cells infected with WNV and, to a lesser amount, WNV and Merida virus-derived DNA in Culex quinquefasciatus Hsu cells. In conclusion, Hsu cells generated Merida virus-derived piRNAs, but our data suggests that the major sRNA response of Culex cells and mosquitoes to WNV infection is the exogenous siRNA response. It is also evident that sRNA responses differ significantly between specific virus-mosquito combinations. Future work using additional Culex-borne viruses may further elucidate how virus-derived piRNAs are generated in Culex cells and what role they may play in controlling replication of different viruses.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsArgonaute ProteinsCell LineCulexFemaleFlavivirusInsect ProteinsIntestinesOvaryRhabdoviridaeRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingSalivary GlandsWest Nile virusArgonaute ProteinsInsect ProteinsRNA, Small InterferingArbovirusCulexMosquitoPIWIRNAiWest nile virus

Identifiers

PMID30959110
PMCPMC6516063
OpenAlexW2929351296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.