Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30958989›Full record

ReviewTurkish thoracic journal2019

Optimizing Post-Intensive Care Unit Rehabilitation.

Natalie Held, Marc Moss

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish thoracic journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04482634 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Is Tele-rehabilitation Superior to Home Exercise Program in the Pulmonary Rehabilitation of the Patients With COVID-19 With Post-intensive Care Syndrome? A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKoç UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled122ConditionsPulmonary Rehabilitation, COVID-19ArmsRemote controlled exercise, Home exercise
NCT04952844 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Functional Capacity in Survivors of COVID-19 Related ARDS: A Cross-sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKoç UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled15ConditionsCovid19, Functional Capacity, Post-intensive Care Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie HeldUniversity of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora Colorado, USA.
Marc MossUniversity of Colorado, Department of Pulmonary Critical Care, Aurora Colorado, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survivors of intensive care unit (ICU) admission face unique challenges after hospital discharge. In addition to an increased overall mortality and rates of hospital readmission, patients often experience difficulties in physical functioning, cognition, and mental health, which are collectively termed post-intensive care syndrome. To this date, there are no established strategies to address these deleterious outcomes. A number of studies have examined various unique methods to prevent and treat PICS symptoms, including early physical and occupational therapy, providing post-discharge education, or facilitating routine follow up in post-ICU clinics. These trials have yet to demonstrate any substantial or meaningful effect in post-ICU patients and collectively reinforce the need for further research to identify effective intervention for patients who survive critical illness.

Identifiers

PMID30958989
PMCPMC6453631
OpenAlexW2905603819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.