Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30958868›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The role of context in implementation research for non-communicable diseases: Answering the 'how-to' dilemma.

Meena Daivadanam, Maia Ingram, Kristi Sidney Annerstedt, Gary Parker, Kirsty Bobrow, Lisa Dolovich, Gillian Gould, Michaela Riddell, Rajesh Vedanthan, Jacqui Webster and 28 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Built Environment and Health Behaviors: Deconstructing the Black Box of Interactions-A Review of Reviews.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Reflections on implementing population-based measures for the prevention of non-communicable diseases].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  8. In Which Ways Does Community-Based Dental Education Facilitate Development of Professional Identity in Undergraduate Curricula? A Scoping Review.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors.

Meena DaivadanamDepartment of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9532-6059
Maia IngramDepartment of Community, Environment and Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Kristi Sidney AnnerstedtDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gary ParkerGlobal Alliance for Chronic Diseases, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kirsty BobrowDepartment of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.
Lisa DolovichDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Gillian GouldSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Michaela RiddellDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Rajesh VedanthanDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Jacqui WebsterThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Australia, Newtown New South Wales, Australia.
Pilvikki AbsetzCollaborative Care Systems Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
Helle Mölsted AlvessonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Odysseas AndroutsosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, School of Health Sciences & Education, Kallithea, Athens, Greece.
Niels ChavannesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands.
Briana CortezZena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Praveen DevarasettyPopulation Health Division, The George Institute for Global Health- India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0973-943X
Edward FottrellGlobal Alliance for Chronic Diseases, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Francisco Gonzalez-SalazarDepartment of Basic Sciences, Universidad de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Jane GoudgeFaculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Omarys HerasmeZena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Hannah JenningsGlobal Alliance for Chronic Diseases, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Deksha KapoorDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Jemima KamanoSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
Marise J KasteleynDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands.
Christina KyriakosEuropean Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention, Brussels, Belgium.
Yannis ManiosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, School of Health Sciences & Education, Kallithea, Athens, Greece.
Kishor MogulluruPopulation Health Division, The George Institute for Global Health- India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Mayowa OwolabiDepartment of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Department of Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Maria Lazo-PorrasUnidad de Conocimiento y Evidencia (CONEVID), CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Disease, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Miraflores, Lima, Peru.
Wnurinham SilvaSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amanda ThriftDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Ezinne UvereDepartment of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Department of Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Ruth WebsterThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Australia, Newtown New South Wales, Australia.
Rianne van der KleijDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands.
Josefien van OlmenDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Constantine VardavasEuropean Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention, Brussels, Belgium.
Puhong ZhangThe George Institute for Global Health at Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
GACD Concepts and Contexts working group

Funding

CIHRMedical Research Council MR/M016501/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnderstanding context and how this can be systematically assessed and incorporated is crucial to successful implementation. We describe how context has been assessed (including exploration or evaluation) in Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases (GACD) implementation research projects focused on improving health in people with or at risk of chronic disease and how contextual lessons were incorporated into the intervention or the implementation process.

methodsUsing a web-based semi-structured questionnaire, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to collect quantitative and qualitative data across GACD projects (n = 20) focusing on hypertension, diabetes and lung diseases. The use of context-specific data from project planning to evaluation was analyzed using mixed methods and a multi-layered context framework across five levels; 1) individual and family, 2) community, 3) healthcare setting, 4) local or district level, and 5) state or national level.

resultsProject teams used both qualitative and mixed methods to assess multiple levels of context (avg. = 4). Methodological approaches to assess context were identified as formal and informal assessments, engagement of stakeholders, use of locally adapted resources and materials, and use of diverse data sources. Contextual lessons were incorporated directly into the intervention by informing or adapting the intervention, improving intervention participation or improving communication with participants/stakeholders. Provision of services, equipment or information, continuous engagement with stakeholders, feedback for personnel to address gaps, and promoting institutionalization were themes identified to describe how contextual lessons are incorporated into the implementation process.

conclusionsContext is regarded as critical and influenced the design and implementation of the GACD funded chronic disease interventions. There are different approaches to assess and incorporate context as demonstrated by this study and further research is required to systematically evaluate contextual approaches in terms of how they contribute to effectiveness or implementation outcomes.

Indexed as

Research DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareDiabetes MellitusFemaleGeographyHealth PromotionHumansHypertensionInternational CooperationInternet

Identifiers

PMID30958868
PMCPMC6453477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.