Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30958825›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Bridging the translational gap: Implementation of multimodal small animal imaging strategies for tumor burden assessment in a co-clinical trial.

S J Blocker, Y M Mowery, M D Holbrook, Y Qi, D G Kirsch, G A Johnson, C T Badea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S J BlockerCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Y M MoweryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
M D HolbrookCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Y QiCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
D G KirschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
G A JohnsonCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
C T BadeaCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1850-2522
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN N. NORTON · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Advancing Cancer Therapy through Ground Breaking Research in Radiation BiologyR35CA197616 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI David Guy Kirsch · 2016 to 2026
$10.7M
The Duke Preclinical Research Resources for Quantitative Imaging BiomarkersU24CA220245 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BADEA, CRISTIAN T · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
Development of a New Generation Micro-CT imaging for Functional and Molecular Imaging of CancerR01CA196667 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BADEA, CRISTIAN T · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196667NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197616NCI NIH HHS U24 CA220245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In designing co-clinical cancer studies, preclinical imaging brings unique challenges that emphasize the gap between man and mouse. Our group is developing quantitative imaging methods for the preclinical arm of a co-clinical trial studying immunotherapy and radiotherapy in a soft tissue sarcoma model. In line with treatment for patients enrolled in the clinical trial SU2C-SARC032, primary mouse sarcomas are imaged with multi-contrast micro-MRI (T1 weighted, T2 weighted, and T1 with contrast) before and after immune checkpoint inhibition and pre-operative radiation therapy. Similar to the patients, after surgery the mice will be screened for lung metastases with micro-CT using respiratory gating. A systems evaluation was undertaken to establish a quantitative baseline for both the MR and micro-CT systems against which others systems might be compared. We have constructed imaging protocols which provide clinically-relevant resolution and contrast in a genetically engineered mouse model of sarcoma. We have employed tools in 3D Slicer for semi-automated segmentation of both MR and micro-CT images to measure tumor volumes efficiently and reliably in a large number of animals. Assessment of tumor burden in the resulting images was precise, repeatable, and reproducible. Furthermore, we have implemented a publicly accessible platform for sharing imaging data collected during the study, as well as protocols, supporting information, and data analyses. In doing so, we aim to improve the clinical relevance of small animal imaging and begin establishing standards for preclinical imaging of tumors from the perspective of a co-clinical trial.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingTumor BurdenX-Ray MicrotomographyAnimalsHumansLung NeoplasmsMiceNeoplasm MetastasisSarcoma

Identifiers

PMID30958825
PMCPMC6453461
OpenAlexW2953068332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.