Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30958817›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Unsupervised extraction of epidemic syndromes from participatory influenza surveillance self-reported symptoms.

Kyriaki Kalimeri, Matteo Delfino, Ciro Cattuto, Daniela Perrotta, Vittoria Colizza, Caroline Guerrisi, Clement Turbelin, Jim Duggan, John Edmunds, Chinelo Obi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Digital microbiology.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Kyriaki KalimeriISI Foundation, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8068-5916
Matteo DelfinoISI Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Ciro CattutoISI Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Daniela PerrottaISI Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Vittoria ColizzaINSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, Paris, France.
Caroline GuerrisiSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, Paris, France.
Clement TurbelinSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, Paris, France.
Jim DugganSchool of Computer Science, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7507-8617
John EdmundsDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Chinelo ObiImmunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infections Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.
Richard PebodyImmunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infections Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9069-2885
Ana O FrancoInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9195-965X
Yamir MorenoISI Foundation, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0895-1893
Sandro MeloniIFISC, Institute for Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Complex Systems (CSIC-UIB), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6202-3302
Carl KoppeschaarScience in Action BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charlotte KjelsøStatens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ricardo MexiaDepartamento de Epidemiologia, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0511-7940
Daniela PaolottiISI Foundation, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seasonal influenza surveillance is usually carried out by sentinel general practitioners (GPs) who compile weekly reports based on the number of influenza-like illness (ILI) clinical cases observed among visited patients. This traditional practice for surveillance generally presents several issues, such as a delay of one week or more in releasing reports, population biases in the health-seeking behaviour, and the lack of a common definition of ILI case. On the other hand, the availability of novel data streams has recently led to the emergence of non-traditional approaches for disease surveillance that can alleviate these issues. In Europe, a participatory web-based surveillance system called Influenzanet represents a powerful tool for monitoring seasonal influenza epidemics thanks to aid of self-selected volunteers from the general population who monitor and report their health status through Internet-based surveys, thus allowing a real-time estimate of the level of influenza circulating in the population. In this work, we propose an unsupervised probabilistic framework that combines time series analysis of self-reported symptoms collected by the Influenzanet platforms and performs an algorithmic detection of groups of symptoms, called syndromes. The aim of this study is to show that participatory web-based surveillance systems are capable of detecting the temporal trends of influenza-like illness even without relying on a specific case definition. The methodology was applied to data collected by Influenzanet platforms over the course of six influenza seasons, from 2011-2012 to 2016-2017, with an average of 34,000 participants per season. Results show that our framework is capable of selecting temporal trends of syndromes that closely follow the ILI incidence rates reported by the traditional surveillance systems in the various countries (Pearson correlations ranging from 0.69 for Italy to 0.88 for the Netherlands, with the sole exception of Ireland with a correlation of 0.38). The proposed framework was able to forecast quite accurately the ILI trend of the forthcoming influenza season (2016-2017) based only on the available information of the previous years (2011-2016). Furthermore, to broaden the scope of our approach, we applied it both in a forecasting fashion to predict the ILI trend of the 2016-2017 influenza season (Pearson correlations ranging from 0.60 for Ireland and UK, and 0.85 for the Netherlands) and also to detect gastrointestinal syndrome in France (Pearson correlation of 0.66). The final result is a near-real-time flexible surveillance framework not constrained by any specific case definition and capable of capturing the heterogeneity in symptoms circulation during influenza epidemics in the various European countries.

Indexed as

EpidemicsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalEuropeHumansIncidenceInfluenza, HumanInternetModels, StatisticalSeasonsSelf ReportSentinel SurveillanceSyndromeUnsupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID30958817
PMCPMC6472822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.