Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30958198›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2019

The unified rule of phyllotaxis explaining both spiral and non-spiral arrangements.

Takuya Okabe, Atsushi Ishida, Jin Yoshimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Geometric Angles and Gene Expression in Cells for Structural Bone Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takuya Okabe1 Graduate School of Integrated Science and Technology, Shizuoka University , 3-5-1 Johoku, Hamamatsu 432-8561 , Japan.
Atsushi Ishida2 Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University , Otsu, Shiga 520-2113 , Japan.
Jin Yoshimura3 Department of Mathematical Systems Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shizuoka University , Hamamatsu 432-8561 , Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaf-like appendages of different plant groups are arranged in common phyllotaxis patterns categorized into two types: spiral and non-spiral arrangements. The adaptive reason for this morphological convergence is unknown. In the non-spiral arrangement, the divergence angle between successive leaves is a simple fraction of 360°, e.g. distichy, decussate and whorled phyllotaxis. In the spiral arrangement, the divergence angle of nascent leaves at the shoot apex is fixed at the golden angle 137.5°, whereas those of the developed leaves varies within a sequence of Fibonacci fractions, such as 1/3, 2/5, 3/8, 5/13, etc. The optimality of the golden angle has been shown recently by assuming that the pattern of developed leaves varies during growth in a manner depending on the divergence angle of nascent leaves. Here we propose a unified rule of phyllotaxis to explain both types of arrangement: the developed leaves form vertical rows along the stem. In the non-spiral arrangement, nascent to developed leaves always follow this rule, so that the number of leaf rows is kept constant irrespective of stem growth. In the spiral arrangement, developed leaves attain this rule by adjusting the divergence angle from the golden angle. The spiral arrangement is adaptive in that the number of leaf rows varies during growth depending on shoot thickness.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPlant Physiological PhenomenaPlant LeavesPlantsconvergent evolutioninternal adaptationplant anatomyplant morphology

Identifiers

PMID30958198
PMCPMC6408360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.