ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2019
Unravelling hagfish slime.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design Principles for Deployable Fibers Inspired by Hagfish Defense.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Physics of unravelling and micromechanics of hagfish threads.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- π-π Conjugated Bonds Stacking/Scattering for Switchable Lubrication in Supramolecular Hydrogel.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Euphraticanoids N-T: Aromadendrane-Type Diterpenes and Sesquiterpenes with Fungicidal Activities fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Fast 3D printing of fine, continuous, and soft fibers via embedded solvent exchange.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of gill-clogging by hagfish slime.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- Permanent deformation of triangle weaver silk enables ultrafast tangle-free release of spider webs.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2021Article
- Biomechanics of pollen pellet removal by the honey bee.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hagfish slime is a unique predator defence material containing a network of long fibrous threads each ∼10 cm in length. Hagfish release the threads in a condensed coiled state known as skeins (∼100 µm), which must unravel within a fraction of a second to thwart a predator attack. Here we consider the hypothesis that viscous hydrodynamics can be responsible for this rapid unravelling, as opposed to chemical reaction kinetics alone. Our main conclusion is that, under reasonable physiological conditions, unravelling due to viscous drag can occur within a few hundred milliseconds, and is accelerated if the skein is pinned at a surface such as the mouth of a predator. We model a single skein unspooling as the fibre peels away due to viscous drag. We capture essential features by considering simplified cases of physiologically relevant flows and one-dimensional scenarios where the fibre is aligned with streamlines in either uniform or uniaxial extensional flow. The peeling resistance is modelled with a power-law dependence on peeling velocity. A dimensionless ratio of viscous drag to peeling resistance appears in the dynamical equations and determines the unraveling time scale. Our modelling approach is general and can be refined with future experimental measurements of peel strength for skein unravelling. It provides key insights into the unravelling process, offers potential answers to lingering questions about slime formation from threads and mucous vesicles, and will aid the growing interest in engineering similar bioinspired material systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.