Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30958135›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2019

Proximity sensors on common noctule bats reveal evidence that mothers guide juveniles to roosts but not food.

Simon Ripperger, Linus Günther, Hanna Wieser, Niklas Duda, Martin Hierold, Björn Cassens, Rüdiger Kapitza, Alexander Koelpin, Frieder Mayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Simon Ripperger1 Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science , Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin , Germany.
Linus Günther1 Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science , Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin , Germany.
Hanna Wieser1 Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science , Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin , Germany.
Niklas Duda3 Institute for Electronics Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg , Wetterkreuz 15, 91058 Erlangen-Tennenlohe , Germany.
Martin Hierold3 Institute for Electronics Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg , Wetterkreuz 15, 91058 Erlangen-Tennenlohe , Germany.
Björn Cassens4 Carl-Friedrich-Gauß-Fakultät, Technische Universität Braunschweig , Mühlenpfordtstraße 23, 38106 Braunschweig , Germany.
Rüdiger Kapitza4 Carl-Friedrich-Gauß-Fakultät, Technische Universität Braunschweig , Mühlenpfordtstraße 23, 38106 Braunschweig , Germany.
Alexander Koelpin5 Chair for Electronics and Sensor Systems, Brandenburg University of Technology , Siemens-Halske-Ring 14, 03046 Cottbus , Germany.
Frieder Mayer1 Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science , Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin , Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female bats of temperate zones often communally rear their young, which creates ideal conditions for naive juveniles to find or learn about resources via informed adults. However, studying social information transfer in elusive and small-bodied animals in the wild is difficult with traditional tracking techniques. We used a novel 'next-generation' proximity sensor system (BATS) to investigate if and how juvenile bats use social information in acquiring access to two crucial resources: suitable roosts and food patches. By tracking juvenile-adult associations during roost switching and foraging, we found evidence for mother-to-offspring information transfer while switching roosts but not during foraging. Spatial and temporal patterns of encounters suggested that mothers guided juveniles between the juvenile and the target roost. This roost-switching behaviour provides evidence for maternal guidance in bats, a form of maternal care that has long been assumed, but never documented. We did not find evidence that mothers guide the offspring to foraging sites. Foraging bats reported brief infrequent meetings with other tagged bats that were best explained by local enhancement. Our study illustrates how this recent advance in automated biologging provides researchers with new insights into longstanding questions in behavioural biology.

Indexed as

ChiropteraMothersAnimalsFemaleHumansbio-loggingforagingmaternal carematernal guidanceNyctalus noctularoost switching

Identifiers

PMID30958135
PMCPMC6405471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.