Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30958133›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2019

High levels of functional divergence in toxicity towards prey among the venoms of individual pigmy rattlesnakes.

Sarah A Smiley-Walters, Terence M Farrell, H Lisle Gibbs

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Causes and Consequences of Snake Venom Variation.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah A Smiley-Walters1 Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210 , USA.
Terence M Farrell3 Department of Biology, Stetson University , DeLand, FL 32723 , USA.
H Lisle Gibbs1 Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210 , USA.
Avail Clinical Research · USColumbus Center · USColumbus Oncology and Hematology Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venom is a complex molecular phenotype that shows high levels of variation in expressed proteins between individuals within and between populations. However, the functional significance of this variation in terms of toxicity towards prey is largely unknown. Here, we assessed the relative toxicity of venom from individual pygmy rattlesnakes ( Sistrurus miliarius) on brown anoles ( Anolis sagrei) using a novel assay involving tests of fixed doses of venom from individual snakes on individual lizards. We found high levels of functional variation between individual venoms within populations with individual differences (nested within population) explaining 3.6 times more variation in toxicity than population differences. Our results suggest a previously unappreciated adaptive significance to within-population variation in venom. They argue that selective mechanisms that maintain variation within populations may be of equal or greater importance to divergent selection leading to local adaption between populations as evolutionary explanations of venom variation within species.

Indexed as

Crotalid VenomsCrotalusLizardsAnimalsPhenotypeProteinsCrotalid VenomsProteinsbrown anolesindividual variationmolecular adaptive phenotypepygmy rattlesnakestoxicityvenom

Identifiers

PMID30958133
PMCPMC6405466
OpenAlexW2911299728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.