Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30958132›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2019

Raw-material selectivity in hook-tool-crafting New Caledonian crows.

Barbara C Klump, Mathieu Cantat, Christian Rutz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DNA barcoding identifies cryptic animal tool materials.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Barbara C KlumpCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews , Sir Harold Mitchell Building, St Andrews KY16 9TH , UK.
Mathieu CantatCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews , Sir Harold Mitchell Building, St Andrews KY16 9TH , UK.
Christian RutzCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews , Sir Harold Mitchell Building, St Andrews KY16 9TH , UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G023913/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals that manufacture foraging tools face the challenge of identifying suitable raw materials among a multitude of options. New Caledonian crows exhibit strong population-specific material preferences for the manufacture of hooked stick tools, but it is unknown how they identify their favourite plants. We investigated experimentally whether crows pay attention to the stems of plants (from which the tools are made) and/or their leaves (which are usually discarded during manufacture but may enable rapid and reliable species identification at a distance). Subjects were highly selective in choice trials with multiple plant species. Two additional treatments with experimental leaf-stem combinations revealed that birds can identify their preferred plant species by its stems alone, and possibly also its leaves. These findings encourage future experiments that investigate whether New Caledonian crows attend to features of the stem that are required for the production of efficient hooked stick tools. Our study provides one of the most detailed assessments to date of how non-human animals identify raw materials for tool manufacture.

Indexed as

CrowsTool Use BehaviorAnimalsFeeding BehaviorPlant LeavescorvidCorvus moneduloidesmaterial selectivitytool manufacturetool selectiontool use

Identifiers

PMID30958132
PMCPMC6405461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.